Dingle v Coppen; Coppen v Dingle
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1899 |
| Date | 1899 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Ulster Investment Bank Ltd v Rockrohan Estate Ltd
...unless he tenders the full amount of the interest due, whether or not any part of the interest is statute barred: See Dingle v. Coppen [1899]1 Ch 726. Likewise, when a mortgagee sells the mortgaged property, he is entitled to retain all arrears of interest, whether or not statute barred, be......
-
Ezekiel v Orakpo
...unless he tenders the full amount of the interest due, whether or not any part of the interest is statute barred: see Dingle v Coppen [1899] 1 Ch. 726. Likewise, when a mortgagee sells the mortgaged property, he is entitled to retain all arrears of interest, whether or not statute barred, b......
-
Courtenay v Williams
...L. R. 8 Eq. 599; In re Milnes, 1885, 53 L. T. 535; In re Akerman [1891], 3 Ch. 212; In re Watson [1896], 1 Ch. 931; Dingle v. Coppen [1899], 1 Ch. 726; In re Lloyd [1903], 1 Ch. 401. See also 3 Hare, 639. [539] courtbnay v. williams. Jwne 27, July 10, 20, 1844. [Affirmed, 15 L. J. Ch. 204. ......
-
Du Vigier v Lee
...134 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY Du Vigier and Lee S. C. 12 L. J. Ch. 345; 7 Jur. 299. See Pile v. Pile, 1875, 23 W. R. 441; Dingle v. Coppen [1899], 1 Ch. 726; In re Lloyd [1903], 1 Ch. 399. [326] dti vigier v. lee. Feb. 15, 16, 17,18, 24, 1843. [S. C. 12 L. J. Ch. 345 ò 7 Jur. 299. See Pile v. ......
Request a trial to view additional results