Dipple v Dipple
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1942 |
Year | 1942 |
Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
18 cases
-
Purse v Purse
...because she had not got an 'enforceable claim', but merely a right to ask the court to exercise its discretionary powers in her favour. Dipple v. Dipple (1942) P.65. In Sugden v. Sugden (1957) P. 120, Denning L. J. (as he then was) said at page 135: "I would add that in divorce proceedings,......
-
Nafisa Hasan v Mahmud Ul-Hasan (Deceased)
...not for later payments. This view of proceedings in the Divorce Court is supported by the decision of Hodson J in ( Dipple v Dipple [1942] 1 All ER 234) where he pointed out that all that the wife had was the hope that the court would in its discretion order a secured provision. She had no......
-
Harb v King Fahd Bin Addul Aziz (Nos. 1 & 2)
...Brandon in Barder v Caluori. Of the eleven considered by Lord Brandon four were particularly emphasised by Mr Moylan namely Dipple v Dipple; Mosey v Mosey and Barker [1956] P 26; Sugden v Sugden [1957] P 120; D'Este v D'Este [1973] Fam 55. There can be no doubt that Lord Brandon cited and a......
-
Barder v Caluori
...when there was some living person, the husband or one or more children of the marriage, who could be benefited by its exercise. 22 In Dipple v. Dipple [1942] P. 65 a husband died after his wife had obtained a decree absolute against him. It was held that the court had no jurisdiction to ent......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
The Political Thought of George Santayana
...of ideas, rich in constellations.’ 6 "A General Confession," pp. 21 f.7 The Realm of Essence, in Realms of Being (one-volume edition, 1942), p. 65. 8 To Ezra Pound (February 7, 1950), in Letters, p. Dialogues in Limbo, p. 29. 665 Plato, in Santayana’s eyes, represents classic humanism, a ki......
-
The Restricted Citizen
...the question of futurepolicy see Carey McWilliams, "JapaneseEvacuation: Policy and Perspectives," Com-mon Ground, Vol. II, No. 4 (Summer 1942),pp. 65-72. at SAGE PUBLICATIONS on December 4, 2012ann.sagepub.comDownloaded from 155shifted from the Army to a civilian or-ganization, the War Relo......