Direct Line Group Ltd v Direct Line Estate Agency Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1996 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
- Kailash Center for Personal Development Inc. v Yoga Magik Pty Ltd
-
British Telecommunications Plc v One in A Million Ltd
...(1896) AC 199 as two cases which set out the principles upon which the law of passing-off depends. He then considered Direct Line Group Ltd v Direct Line Estate Agency (1997) FSR 374 and Glaxo Plc v Glaxowellcome Ltd (1996) FSR 388. Those were cases where interlocutory relief was granted ......
-
Koza Ltd v Koza Altin Isletmeleri as
...be very much in everyone's mind. At the other extreme, there are the facts of Direct Line Group Ltd v. Direct Line Estate Agency Ltd [1997] F.S.R. 374, where Laddie J. formed a very clear view as to the merits: while he was only granting an interlocutory injunction, he not only made a favou......
-
Kabushiki Kaisha Yakult Honsha And Others v Yakudo Group Holdings Ltd And Another
...Challenger Pty Ltd [1982] FSR 1; Glaxo Plc v Glaxo-Wellcome Ltd [1996] FSR 388; Direct Line Group Ltd v Direct Line Estate Agency Ltd [1997] FSR 374. In British Telecommunications Plc v One in a Million Ltd [1999] FSR 1, Aldous LJ reviewed these cases and considered that the rationale behin......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Cyberbusters versus Cybersquatters: Round II in the ZADNA Ring
...under that name. Another example of a court case relating to‘company name squatting’ is Direct Line GroupLtd v Direct Line Estate Agency [1997] FSR 374.20Prince Plc v Prince Sports Group Inc [1998] FSR 21; Simon Halberstam, Joanne Brook &Jonathan DC Turner Tolley’s Domain Names: A Practical......