Dixon v Dixon
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1953 |
| Date | 1953 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Thoday v Thoday
...with, a party will not be held to be estopped from raising that issue again in a subsequent suit. That is what happened in the case of Dixon v. Dixon, (1953) Probate 103. If, on the other hand, particular issues have been the subject of specific adjudication, much may depend upon how they ......
- Medford v Medford
-
Medford v Medford
...in Pike v. Pike (Supra). He said at p.191: “We were referred to Pike v. Pike and, in view of some comments made on it by Davies, J., in Dixon v. Dixon, I think I ought to explain some of the things I there said. In considering whether one party has good cause for leaving the other, much dep......
-
Holland v Holland
...illustrated this proposition very aptly by reference to previous cases, and I would refer in particular to two of those cases, namely, Dixon v. Dixon, 1953 Probate, page 103, and Hill v. Hill, 1954 Probate, page 291. The interesting thing about those two cases is that they were both decisio......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Parties and Politics in the Netherlands
...liberals or the Christian-Historicals. (On the burgemeester see P. J. Oud, ‘The Burgomaster in Holland’, Public Administration, vol. xxxi (1953), p. 103.) 16 PARTIES AND POLITICS IN THE NETHERLANDS bodies. Against this potential danger one can set three factors: generally good standards of ......