Doe Ex D. Knight v Quigley
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 04 December 1810 |
| Date | 04 December 1810 |
| Court | High Court |
English Reports Citation: 170 E.R. 1233
IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS
Tuesday, Dec. 4, 1810. doe ex d. knight v. quigley. (If a man gets into possession of a house to be let, without the privity of the landlord, and they afterwards enter into a negociation for a lease, but differ upon the terms, the landlord may maintain ejectment to recover possession of the premises without giving any notice to quit.) Ejectment to recover possession of a house in Conway Street. It appealed that Knight, who had a lease of this house, wished to underlet it , that while it remained empty, the defendant had got into possession of it without Knighf s privity, intending to take a lease of it from him ; that some negociation afterwards took place between the parties upon the subject; but that they disagreed about the valuation of the fixtures It was objected, on the part of the defendant, that a notice to quit was necessary under these circumstances. Lortt Ellenborough.-There is no evidence of any demise to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lord Talbot De Malahide v Best and Others
...B. 973. Tindal v. RoeENR 2 B. & Ad. 922. Cundey v. SharpleyENR 15 M. & W. 558. Persse v. kinnen 9 I. C. L. App. 23. Knight v. QuigleyENR 2 Camp. 505. Parker v. BoultonENR 6 M. & S. 148. Kennedy v. Liddy Post, 314. Jacquot v. BouraENR 5 M. & W. 155. Smith v. BrownENR 2 M. & W. 851. Lawrence ......
-
M'Creesh v M'Geough
...11 Moore, 222. Edwards v. ReesENR 7 C. & P. 340. Tomlinson v. DayENR 5 Moore, 558. John v. JenkinsENR 1 Cr. & M. 227. Knight v. QuigleyENR 2 Camp. 505. Warre v. Burnside 1 Wils. 176. Turner v. BennettENRENR 9 M. & W. 646; 7 M. & W. 226. Harper v. CharlesworthENR 4 B. & C. 574. Tayleur v. Wi......