Doe on the demise of Phillips against Aldridge
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1791 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Robb and Reid v The Right Rev Bishop Dorrian
...v. SmallUNK 13 Ir. C. L. R. 558. Prosser v. EdwardsENR 1 Y. & C. Ex. 481. Donnelland v. O'Neill Ir. R. 5 Eq. 523. Doe v. AldridgeENR 4 T. R. 264. Doe d. Toone and West v. CopestakeENR 6 East, 328. Jack v. Reilly 2 H. & Br. 301. Incorporated Society v. Richards 1 Dr. & War. 320. Attorney-Gen......
-
Devereux and Another against Barclay and Another
...The conversion must be an injurious act. A mere misdelivery by mistake will not do. That was so considered by Buller J. in Syeds v. Hay (4 T. R. 264). The case of a warehouseman and a carrier stand on the same ground. Now for a mis-delivery by a carrier, trover will not lie, although he may......
-
Corcoran v O'Kane
...and for the heir-at-law as to the balance. R. W. L. (1) 4 Dr. 350. (1) I. R. 11 C. L. 292. (2) [1902] 2 Ch. 642. (3) [1907] 1 Ch. 382. (1) 4 T. R. 264. (2) I. R. 5 Eq. (3) [1902] 2 Ch., at p. 647. (4) I. R. 11 C. L. 292. (5) 9 L. R. Ir. 226. (6) [1902] 1 I. R. 103. (7) 3 Dr. 245; 4 Dr. 350.......
-
Dufresne v Hutchinson
...the actual produce that remained after making that payment. Best Se*. now showed came. He contended, upon the authority of Syeds v, Hay, 4 T. R. 264, that where a bailee disposes of goods in a manner contrary to the directions of the bailor, as here, trover lies, and that the parting with t......
Request a trial to view additional results