Doe on the demise of Neale against Samples

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date24 April 1838
Date24 April 1838
CourtCourt of the Queen's Bench

English Reports Citation: 112 E.R. 794

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH

Doe on the demise of Neale against Samples

S. C. 3 N. & P. 255; 1 W. W. & H. 228; 7 L. J. Q. B. 140; 2 Jur. 841.

[151] dob on the demise of NEALE against samples. Tuesday, April 24th, 1838. A document more than thirty years old is admissible in evidence without proof of execution, if produced by persons whose possession of it may be reasonably accounted for, although their custody be not the strictly proper one. A. conveyed lands to trustees by way of marriage settlement, the deed containing a proviso that it should be void if the marriage did not take place in six months. The marriage did ao take place. Afterwards A. executed a mortgage of the same lands in fee. On his death, the mortgagee brought ejectment against A.'s son, then in possession. The son, in defence, produced the deed of settlement, which appeared to have remained among his father's papers ever since the execution, and was more than thirty years old. Held, that the deed might be read in evidence without proof of the execution. [S. C. 3 N. & P. 255; 1 W. W. & H. 228 ; 7 L. J. Q. B. 140; 2 Jur. 841.] On the trial of this ejectment, before Lord Denman C.J., at the laat Winchester Assizes, it appeared that the lessor of the plaintiff claimed under a mortgage to him in fee, by lease and release, executed in 1821 by John Samples, the defendant's father, since deceased. The defendant's case was, that, in 1785, the father, being then seised of the premises in question, executed a conveyance of them to trustees, by way of marriage settlement; the limitations being for the benefit of himself for his life, then of his intended wife for her life, and, after the death of the survivor of them, to the use of the children of the marriage, one of whom was the defendant: and consequently that, at the time of the supposed mortgage, the mortgagor had only a life-estate. The defendant's attorney produced the deed of settlement, which he had found among the papers of John Samples the father, at his late residence. It bore date November 9th, 1785, and contained a proviso avoiding it if the marriage should not be solemnized within six calendar months. The marriage was proved to have taken place within that time. No evidence was given as to the execution of the deed ; but it was put in as proving itself, being more than thirty years old. The plaintiff's counsel objected that proof of execution could not be dispensed with on this...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Davison against Wilson and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the Queen's Bench
    • 5 May 1848
    ...See Regina v. Kenilwarth, 7 Q. B. 642. (a) See Bishop of Meath v. Marquess of Winchester, 3 New Ca. 183, 200; Doe dem, Neak v. Samples, 8 A. & E. 151. (V)1 Erie J. was absent. HQ.B.S91. DAVISON V. WILSON 707 freehold of one defendant, wherefore he in his own right, and the others as his ser......
  • The Estate of Martin Charles Ffrench, Owner; v James Tyrrell, Petitioner
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • 13 July 1887
    ...28 Beav. 91. In re Morgan, Pillgrem v. Pillgrem 18 Ch. Div. 93 Rice v. RiceENR 2 Drew. 73 Cave v. Cave 15 Ch. Div. 693. Neale v. Samples 8 A. & E. 151. Croughton v. BlakeENR 12 M. & W. 205. Reg. v. MyttonENR 2 E. & E. 557. Burke's EstateUNK 9 L. R. Ir. 24. Rice v. RiceENR 2 Drew. 73. Burke'......
  • The Queen against Sewell
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the Queen's Bench
    • 5 December 1845
    ...in the premises. That afterwards, to wit, &c., at the assizes (a)2 held at Kingston upon Thames in and (d) See Doe dem. Neale v. Samples, 8 A. & E. 151; Croughton v. Blake, 12 M. & W. 205; Regina v. Kenilworth, 1 Q. B. 642. (a)1 See Begina v. Train, 12 A. & E. 761. (a)1 Stat. 11 G. 2, c. 19......
  • Doe, on the several demises of John Earl of Shrewsbury and of James Hurd Allen, against Thomas Keeling
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the Queen's Bench
    • 19 April 1848
    ...Taunt. 91), at Nisi Prius before Lawrence J. (who relied on a case of Michell v. Eabbetts (not reported), and Doe dem. Neale v. Samples (8 A. & E. 151). It has never been decided that the attorney of the party entitled to the custody of the lease represents the party in this respect. No rea......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT