Dominion of Canada v Province of Ontario
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1910 |
| Date | 1910 |
| Year | 1910 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
Colombie-Britannique (Procureur général) c. Alberta (Procureur général),
...of Ontario v. Attorney-General of Canada (1907), 39 S.C.R. 14; Province of Ontario v. Dominion of Canada (1909), 42 S.C.R. 1, affd [1910] A.C. 637 (P.C.); Canadian Council of Churches v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 236, (1992), 2 L.R. (2d) 229; Reference......
-
AZC20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
...(1911) 12 CLR 667 at 708. 167 South Australia v Victoria (1911) 12 CLR 667 at 708, quoting Dominion of Canada v Province of Ontario [1910] AC 637 at 645 per Lord 168 South Australia v Victoria (1911) 12 CLR 667 at 708. 169 South Australia v Victoria (1911) 12 CLR 667 at 715. 170 R v Toohey;......
-
George Gordon First Nation v Saskatchewan,
...reached by the Commissioners (at 39): We find then that it was expressly decided by the Privy Council in the case of Canada vs. Ontario, (1910) A.C. 637, and the earlier cases therein referred to, that the Dominion has no legal claim against a Province or against the lands of a Province whe......
-
British Columbia (Attorney General) v. Alberta (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1195
...Supreme Court case provides more insight into the scope of section 19. Province of Ontario v Dominion of Canada (1909), 42 SCR 1, aff’d [1910] AC 637 (PC), was not a challenge to the validity of legislation, but a claim by Canada to be reimbursed by Ontario for the annuities paid according ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Litigating Cross-Border Aboriginal Title Claims in Canada: The Possibility (and Necessity) of a Federal Legislative Response to Newfoundland and Labrador (Attorney General) v. Uashaunnuat (Innu of Uashat and of Mani-Utenam).
...note 93; Ontario Mining Co v Seybold (1902), [1903] AC 73, [1902] JCJ No 2 (PC) [Seybold]; Dominion of Canada v Province of Ontario, [1910] AC 637, [1910] JCJ No 1 [Canada v Ontario]; Attorney-General for the Province of Quebec v Attorney-General for the Dominion of Canada (1920), [1921] 1 ......
-
Beyond Space and Time - A Purposive Examination of Section 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867
...seen the policy in those terms. 50 Ontario v. Canada (1909), 42 s.C.r. 1 at 117–18, idington J . , aff’d without comment on this point [1910] a.C. 637 (J.C.P.C.). 51 The sentiment misses the mark in another respect: subsequent decisions of the supreme Court of Canada have held that a grant ......