Dominus Red v Holland
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1681 |
| Date | 01 January 1681 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 889
King's Bench Division
See Sharp v. St. Sauveur, 1871 L. R. 7 Ch. 353.
dominus rex versus holland. [See Sharp v. St. Sauvew; 1871 L. R. 7 Ch. 353.] An office was found and returned in the Chancery, that a copyhold in Islington was 14 Car. granted to one John Holland and his heirs at the will of the lord, &c. in trust for one Margaret Taylor (who was an alien) and her heirs; and that the profits were disposed according to the trust, and that after M. T. died : and this was by virtue of a commission to enquire what lands, &c. M. T. had, and the commissioners seised the land; whereupon Holland came and shewed his title, and traversed the seisin in trust for M. T. And issue being joyned, it was found for the King; and note the venire facias was awarded in the Chancery retornable in this Court, and the 890 TRIN. 22 CAR. BANCO REGI3 AtRYN, 15. record sent hither, (for they try no issue there). And exception was taken to the writ because it was quorum quilibet habet 4 libratas terra, and according to stat. 27 El. cap. 6. which extends only to this Court C. B. Exchequer and Justices of AssUe: to which it was answered, that forasmuch as it is returnable in this Court, it is welt enough within the statute; but that answer was not allowed : but because this clause was added by the statute of 35 H. 8. cap. 7. which was in the affirmative, that the writ should continue quorum quilibet habet 2 libratas terras. And the statute 27 El. adds that it shall be 4 libratas in such Courts, but no negative words in either statute; therefore it is but abundans cautela, and makes not the writ vicious. And Eoll said that it was so adjudged Mich. 21 Jac. between Philpot and Feilder. The questions in law were, 1. If the King should have the trust: 2. If by virtue of that he might seise the land: 3. If the case differ'd, because copyhold. And it was argued the last term by Mountagua for Holland, and Hale for the King; and this terra by Maynard for Holland, and Twisden for the King. 1. That uses at the common law were things partly in action, so that they were not given to the King by general words of hereditaments in statutes, as is agreed in The Marquess of Winchesters case. And they consisted in privity, and therefore could not be transferred by act in law, as by escheat for attainder, &c. And the preamble of the statute of 27 H. 8. [15] which reduces the possession to the use, recites that by conveyances to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
LVT/0026/08/14: 11 Llannerch Hall, St Asaph
...respect of such work.” 73. We reject the Respondent’s submission that the contra proferentem rule applies here. Again, citing Rosenthal et al14, they conclude, having reviewed the relevant authorities of the maxim’s application in a service charge context that “The contra proferentem rule i......
-
Divito c. Canada (Sécurité publique et Protection civile),
...PublIque et ProteCtIon CIvIle)Cour d’appel fédérale, juges Nadon, Trudel et Mainville, J.C.A.—Montréal, 14 octobre 2010; Ottawa, 3 février 2011.Droit constitutionnel — Charte des droits — Liberté de circulation et d’établissem......
-
Kazemi Estate v. Iran (SCC), 2014 SCC 62
...la fonction publique et les mandataires de l'État, une entité abstraite qui ne peut agir que par l'entremise d'individus. Fait important, l' al. 14(1) c ) de la LIÉ prévoit que le certificat délivré par le ministre des Affaires étrangères pour attester du fait qu'une ou des personnes doiven......
-
Ontario (Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services) v. Information and Privacy Commissioner (Ont.) et al., [2014] N.R. TBEd. AP.014
...» ou de « faciliter la perpétration d'un acte illégal ou d'entraver la répression du crime » (al. 14(1)e) et l)). Les exceptions relatives à l'application de la loi ont pour objet de protéger le public et d'assurer l'applicati......
-
Insider Trading: 2009 Review
...case exemplifies this trend more than U.S. v. Rajaratnam, et al.13 and the parallel SEC enforcement action, SEC v. Galleon Management, LP, et al.14 The Galleon case involves allegations of widespread insider trading at several hedge funds including Galleon Management, LP – a formerly multi-......
-
Landmark Lead Paint Abatement Case Decided In California
...sale of lead 28 pigment and/or lead paint for home use. Instead, after becoming aware of the hazards People v. Atlantic Richfield Company, et al. 14 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara Case No. 1-00-CV-788657 Statement of E-FILED: Jan 7, 2014 4:06 PM, Superior Court of CA, C......
-
InterConnect - Fall 2018
...against brokers are Mecca & Sons Trucking v. White Arrow,13 Nature’s One, Inc. v. Spring Hill Jersey Cheese, Inc., v. WD Logistics, L.L.C. et al,14 and Georgia Nut Company v. C.H. Robinson Company.15 In Mecca, Trader Joe’s purchased approximately $81,000 worth of cheese from Singleton Dairy......
-
EPO Oppositions Newsletter - Surge In Oppositions Matches Surge In Grants
...Philip Morris Products 18 Electrolux 17 Saint-Gobain 17 Bayer 16 Henkel 16 Krauss-Maffei 15 Mitsubishi 15 Amgen 14 Colgate-Palmolive 14 L'Oréal 14 Roche 14 Valeo 14 3M 13 CLAAS 13 Dürr Systems 13 ABB 12 Abbott 12 Giesecke & Devrient 12 KCI Licensing, Inc. 12 Knorr-Bremse 12 Merck 12 N.V......
-
La progresiva configuración del Sistema de Preferencias Generalizadas a lo largo del tercer decenio como instrumento de política comercial conectado con la cooperación al desarrollo y el fomento del desarrollo sostenible
...elaborados, ya que los derechos de aduana del tabaco bruto no elaborado utilizado por la industria europea del tabaco podrían pasar del 6,4 % al 14,9 %, y del 3,9 % al 7,7 %, según los tipos de tabaco; e igualmente los derechos de aduana sobre los cigarros y cigarrillos pasarían del 9,1 % a......
-
RETRIBUTION AGAINST CATHOLIC DIOCESES BY REVIVAL: THE EVOLUTION AND LEGACY OF THE NEW YORK CHILD VICTIMS ACT.
...Andrew J. Wistrich, The Puzzling Purposes of Statutes of Limitations, 28 PAC. L. J. 453, 454 (1997). (13) See, e.g., LEE S. KRIENDLER ET AL., 14 N.Y. PRAC., NEW YORK LAW OF TORTS [section] 9:16 (2020). Vicarious liability of an employer for torts committed by an employee allocates risk of h......
-
EU fundamental rights and democracy implications of data-driven political campaigns
...8 Internet Policy Review (2019), p. 11.7. I. S. Rubinstein, Wisconsin Law Review (2014), p. 864-865.8. F. J. Zuiderveen Borgesius et al., 14 Utrecht Law Review (2018), p. 84.Brkan 775 uses during the US presidential elections9and the Brexit referendum in 2016,10as well as to otheruses in Eu......
-
Upsetting the Apple Cart: Certifying Class Actions for Food Labelling Reform
...recouvrement collectif13. Les tribunaux appliquent l’article 1031 Cpc avec flexibilité et souplesse. Ainsi, dans Marcotte c Banque de Montréal14, le juge Gascon (alors juge à la Cour supérieure du Québec) traitait en détail des différences entre le recouvrement collectif et le recouvrement ......