Donohue v Armco Inc. and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1999
Year1999
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
38 cases
  • Celltech R&D Ltd and MedImmune Inc.
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 October 2004
    ...by the claims of the patent as construed in the US Court. 28 Mr Floyd particularly relied upon the decision of the House of Lords in Donohue v Armco [2002] 1 Lloyds Rep. 425. There, in very simplified summary, US proceedings had been commenced by a group of related companies against a numbe......
  • Evergreen International SA v Volkswagen Group Singapore Pte Ltd and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 June 2003
    ...the Originating Summons on 4th to 74th out of jurisdiction should be dismissed. This was the approach taken in Donohue v Armco Inc [1999] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 649. 21 On amenability to the jurisdiction, Mr. Chong argues that apart from considering whether the Defendants have been properly served,......
  • National Westminster Bank Plc v Utrecht-America Finance Company [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 May 2001
    ... ... ("TOA") between Utrecht, National Westminster Bank PLC ("NWB") and others dated 15 th October 1997 under which Utrecht bought NWB's interest in a ... and a Delaware subsidiary of YFG called Yorkshire Dried Fruit & Nuts Inc. As already stated, the essential purpose of the TOA was to effect a ... ] 1 WLR 588, The Angelic Grace [1995] 1 Lloyd's Rep 87 and Donohue v Armco Inc [2000] 1 Lloyd's Rep 579 ... Mr Brindle submitted that those ... ...
  • Incitec Ltd v Alkimos Shipping Corporation
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free