Douglas-Menzies v Umphelby
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1908 |
| Date | 1908 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Re Berger, decd
...wishes…In this sense it is inaccurate to speak of a man leaving two wills; he does leave, and can leave, but one will". ( Douglas-Menzies v. Umphelby [1908] A.C. 224 at 233). 45 Having regard to the existing distribution of business between the various divisions of the High Court, under whi......
-
Brown v Gregson
... ... [They also cited Cooper v. Cooper F13 ; Codrington v. Codrington F14 ; Douglas-Menzies v. Umphelby F15 ; Pitman v. Crum Ewing F16 ; Bell's Commentaries, 7th ed., vol. i., p. 143; McLaren's Wills and Succession, 3rd ed., p. 254, § 471; ... ...
-
Civil Air Operations Officers Association of Australia v Airservices Australia
...equivalent was the doctrine of equitable election between estates: Lissenden v CAV Bosch Ltd [1940] AC 412; Douglas-Menzies v Umphelby [1908] AC 224; Elder’s Trustee and Executor Co Ltd v Commonwealth Homes and Investment Co Ltd [1941] HCA 31; (1941) 65 CLR 603, 617 - 618. The notion of app......
-
Re Hafner Olhausen v Powderley
...Ch. App. 20. (3) [1910] 1 Ch. 312. (4) 1 Bli. 1. (5) 2 Sch. & Lef. 444. (6) 9 Ir. Ch. R. 535. (7) 8 Ch. App. 578; L. R. 7 H. L. 854. (8) [1908] A. C. 224. (1) [1907] 2 I. R. 27. (2) [1929] 1 Ch. 300. (3) [1919] 1 Ch. 225. (4) [1905] 2 Ch. 441. (5) [1899] 1 I. R. 6. (6) [1925] A. C. 700. (7)......
Request a trial to view additional results