DPP v Bradfute & Associates Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1967 |
| Date | 1967 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Imperial Tobacco Ltd v Attorney General
...(1925) 41 T.L.R. 555 (newspaper); Howgate v. Ralph (1929) 45 T.L.R. 426 (tea); Hobbs v. Ward (1929) 45 T.L.R. 373 (dog-food); DPP. v. Bradfute & Associates Ltd. [1967] 2 Q.B. 291 (cat-food). All are consistent with the conclusion I have expressed. The "mistake" in these cases which Lord Den......
-
Imperial Tobacco Ltd v Attorney General
...555; for the tea Howgate v. Ralph (1929) 45 T.L.R.426; for dog food Hollis Ward (1929) 45 T.L.R. 373; for cat food D.P.P. v. Bradfute (1967) 2 Q.B. 291. 45 After 70 years, however, the mistake was perceived. It was first noticed in McCollon v. Wrightson (1965) A.C. 522, where H the House of......
-
Flynn v Denieffe
...49 I.L.T.R. 234. Attorney General (McGrath) v. Healy [1972] I.R. 393. Director of Public Prosecutions v. Bradfute and Associates Ltd. [1967] 2 Q.B. 291; [1967] 2 W.L.R. 459; [1967] 1 All E.R. 112. Attorney General (Enright) v. Best's Stores Ltd. [1970] I.R. 225. Imperial Tobacco Ltd. v. Att......
-
R v Burt & Adams
...offence is committed. This alternative argument, which involved some consideration of the decision of the Divisional Court in DPP. v Bradfute and Associates Ltd (1967) 2 WLR 459 was presented to, but not directly addressed by the trial judge. Mr Strauss' second alternative submission was th......
Request a trial to view additional results