DPP v Denning
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1991 |
| Year | 1991 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
R (on the application of Aisling Hubert) v Manchester Crown Court Dr Prabha Sivaraman (Interested Party)
...Party drew the attention of the judge to the analysis of the central phrase "an unnecessary or improper act or omission" set out in DPP v Denning [1991] 2 QB 532 at 541, where Nolan LJ said that the meaning of the word "improper": "… does not necessarily connote some grave impropriety. Used......
-
Adnan Ali Quayum v Director of Public Prosecution
...the conviction quashed, an application for costs of a different type was made and granted. 26 Roch J gave the other judgment of the court in Denning. He made it clear that the case turned on the effect of a notice of discontinuance. His conclusion was in these terms: "The conclusion that I ......
-
R (DPP) v Sheffield Crown Court Peter Barry Goodison and Another (Interested Parties)
...of Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] Ch 205, 232, 239, CA applied.Director of Public Prosecutions v Denning [1991] 2 QB 532, DC not followed.The following cases are referred to in the judgment of the court:Director of Public Prosecutions v Denning [1991] 2 QB 532; [1991......
-
R David Haigh v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court (Sitting at West London Magistrates' Court) Mr Hisham AL Rayes and Others
...on the part of a party in the context of s.19 of the Act had the meaning given to it by Nolan LJ (as he then was) in DPP v Denning [1991] 2 QB 532, at p.541 or whether the test for impropriety was to be equated with that for wasted costs ordered against a legal representative under s.19A of......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Divisional Court
...since the prosecutionhad not been to blame, no award should be made. Full costs (about £1,5(0)were awarded. On appeal, inDPPv Denning [1991] 3 WLR 235, theprosecutor took two points: (1) that the justices had no jurisdiction toaward costs at that stage (ie after the proceedings had been dis......