DPP v Denning

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Year1991
Date1991

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
35 cases
  • R (on the application of Aisling Hubert) v Manchester Crown Court Dr Prabha Sivaraman (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 18 December 2015
    ...the attention of the judge to the analysis of the central phrase "an unnecessary or improper act or omission" set out in DPP v Denning [1991] 2 QB 532 at 541, where Nolan LJ said that the meaning of the word "improper": "… does not necessarily connote some grave impropriety. Used, as it is,......
  • Adnan Ali Quayum v Director of Public Prosecution
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 20 May 2015
    ...the conviction quashed, an application for costs of a different type was made and granted. 26 Roch J gave the other judgment of the court in Denning. He made it clear that the case turned on the effect of a notice of discontinuance. His conclusion was in these terms: "The conclusion that I ......
  • Oliver Lewis v Sarah Louise Francis
    • United Kingdom
    • Administrative Court
    • 9 January 2025
    ...those discussed in Blackstone's Criminal Practice 2025, at D33.35–D33.37. Six such cases were cited to me. The first in time is DPP v. Denning [1991] 2 QB 532, an appeal by case stated to the Divisional Court (Nolan LJ and Roch 40 The court dismissed the prosecutor's appeal against a costs ......
  • Andrea Clerk v Gas Safe Register
    • United Kingdom
    • Administrative Court
    • 9 August 2024
    ...Improper conduct means an act or omission that would not have occurred if the party concerned had conducted his case properly ( DPP v Denning [1991] 2 QB 532). (c) The test is one of impropriety, not merely unreasonableness ( R v Counsell (unreported) 13 March 2014, Crown Court at Bristol).......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Divisional Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 56-1, February 1992
    • 1 February 1992
    ...since the prosecutionhad not been to blame, no award should be made. Full costs (about £1,5(0)were awarded. On appeal, inDPPv Denning [1991] 3 WLR 235, theprosecutor took two points: (1) that the justices had no jurisdiction toaward costs at that stage (ie after the proceedings had been dis......