DPP v Denning

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1991
Year1991
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
29 cases
  • R (on the application of Aisling Hubert) v Manchester Crown Court Dr Prabha Sivaraman (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 18 Diciembre 2015
    ...Party drew the attention of the judge to the analysis of the central phrase "an unnecessary or improper act or omission" set out in DPP v Denning [1991] 2 QB 532 at 541, where Nolan LJ said that the meaning of the word "improper": "… does not necessarily connote some grave impropriety. Used......
  • Adnan Ali Quayum v Director of Public Prosecution
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 20 Mayo 2015
    ...the conviction quashed, an application for costs of a different type was made and granted. 26 Roch J gave the other judgment of the court in Denning. He made it clear that the case turned on the effect of a notice of discontinuance. His conclusion was in these terms: "The conclusion that I ......
  • R (DPP) v Sheffield Crown Court Peter Barry Goodison and Another (Interested Parties)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 20 Junio 2014
    ...of Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] Ch 205, 232, 239, CA applied.Director of Public Prosecutions v Denning [1991] 2 QB 532, DC not followed.The following cases are referred to in the judgment of the court:Director of Public Prosecutions v Denning [1991] 2 QB 532; [1991......
  • The King on the application of AB (by his litigation friend CD) v Uxbridge Youth Court
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 21 Noviembre 2023
    ...was an unnecessary or improper act or omission. He makes a comparison with the facts of Director of Public Prosecutions v Denning [1991] 2 QB 532 where the test was held to have been satisfied in a case where the charge before the justices was using or permitting a goods vehicle to be used......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Divisional Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 56-1, February 1992
    • 1 Febrero 1992
    ...since the prosecutionhad not been to blame, no award should be made. Full costs (about £1,5(0)were awarded. On appeal, inDPPv Denning [1991] 3 WLR 235, theprosecutor took two points: (1) that the justices had no jurisdiction toaward costs at that stage (ie after the proceedings had been dis......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT