DPP v Hynde

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1998
Date1998
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Sulisen Sdn Bhd v Kerajaan Malaysia
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2006
  • Crown Prosecution Service v Lucasz Christof
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 22 October 2015
    ...had to decide. They are R v Williamson (1978) 67 Cr App R 35; R v Simpson [1983] 1 WLR 1494; Director of Public Prosecutions v Hynde [1998] 1 WLR 1222; and R v Vasili [2011] 2 Cr App R 5. Those cases together give authoritative guidance to courts seeking to determine whether an item was mad......
  • John Denis De Silva v Crescent Court Management Corporation
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2006
  • Ratu v R
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 15 August 2013
    ...Whether the knuckleduster was being used for an innocent purpose was irrelevant. The Judge referred to the following statement from DPP v Hynde, 28 cited with approval by Winkelmann J in R v Thomson: 29 …[A] bayonet may be used as a toasting fork, but it is still made for causing bodily inj......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT