DPP v Nasralla

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1967
Year1967
Date1967

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
133 cases
  • Maharaj v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ...which he was entitled to redress under section 6 (post, pp.395F-G, 396A-D, F-H, 397D-G). Director of Public Prosecutions v. Nasralla [1967] 2 A.C. 238, P.C. and de Freitas v. Benny [1976] A.C. 239, P.C. applied. (3) That section 6 of the Constitution was intended to create a new remedy for ......
  • Re Harrington (pet. all.); R v Dorking Justices, ex parte Harrington (pet. all.)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • June 14, 1984
    ...do better than refer to the opinion of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council delivered by Lord Devlin in Director of Public Prosecutions v. Nasralla [1967] 2 A.C. 238 where the noble and learned Lord said, at pp. 249-250: "But if the rule against double jeopardy and the principles of ......
  • Baker v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ...pp. 785A-D, G-H). Maloney Gordon v. The Queen (1969) 15 W.I.R. 359, P.C. not followed. Director of Public Prosecutions v. Nasralla [1967] 2 A.C. 238, P.C. and Reg. v. Wright (1972) 18 W.I.R. 302 applied. Judgment of the Court of Appeal of Jamaica affirmed. The following cases are referred t......
  • Bahamas Entertainment Ltd v Koll and Others
    • Bahamas
    • Supreme Court (Bahamas)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
  • Transitions in Caribbean Law: An Introduction
    • Jamaica
    • Transitions in Caribbean Law Preliminary sections
    • November 21, 2013
    ...2010) 69. 77. See M. Demerieux, Chapter 8, T. Robinson, ‘Gender, Nation and the Common Law Constitution’ (2008) 28(4) OJLS 735. 78. (1967) 10 WIR 299 (PC Ja). 79. (1978) 30 WIR 310 (PC T&T). 80. (1976) WIR 498 (PC T&T). xxi Transitions in Caribbean Law for judges, and common law adjudicatio......
  • Case Law
    • Jamaica
    • On Your Feet: Criminal Law Practice in the Parish Courts in Jamaica
    • June 21, 2021
    ...particular place or area at the material time. Amendment s. 278 Judicature (Parish Courts) Act Autrefois Acquit DPP v Patrick Nasralla [1967] 2 AC 238 Privy Council, Jamaica Proof of a verdict of acquittal (not mere peril of conviction) was essential to found the plea of autrefois acquit . ......
  • Judicial Independence as an Indispensable Feature of the Rule of Law and Democracy: Implications for the Commonwealth Caribbean
    • Jamaica
    • Transitions in Caribbean Law The habits of constitutionalism
    • November 21, 2013
    ...73 WIR 201 (CAECS St K-N). 64. Sookermany v DPP (1996) 48 WIR 346 (CA T&T); DPP v Tokai (1994) 48 WIR 376 (HC T&T). 65. DPP v Nasralla [1967] 2 AC 238, (1967) 10 WIR 299 (PC Ja); AG v Caterpillar Americas Co (2000) 62 WIR 135 (CA Guy); Campbell-Rodriques v AG [2007] UKPC 65 (Ja). 66. Min Ho......
  • The prosecution's right to appeal in Trinidad and Tobago: The State v Boyce
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 16-1, June 2006
    • June 1, 2006
    ...that are expressed in absolute and unlimited 23 The Judicial Committee cited with approval Director of Public Prosecutions v Nasralla [1967] 2 AC 238, and de Freitas v Benny [1976] AC 239. 24 D McKoy, 'The Evolving Constitutional Law on Prolonged Delay after Sentence' (1993) 18(1) WILJ 1. t......
  • Get Started for Free