DPP v Orum
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1988 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Coleman v Power
...437 at 444. 13 [1967] NZLR 437 at 446. 14 (1966) 9 FLR 237. 15 (1966) 9 FLR 237 at 243. 16 Marsh v Arscott (1982) 75 Cr App R 211 . 17 [1989] 1 WLR 88 at 93; [1988] 3 All ER 449 at 18 Done at New York on 19 December 1966, [1980] Australian Treaty Series No 23. 19 (1992) 176 CLR 1 at 38. 2......
-
Clifford v DPP (Garda McLoughlin)
...of Public Prosecutions [2008] IEHC 322, (Unrep, Charleton J, 29/10/2008); Corporation of Dublin v Flynn [1980] IR 357; DPP v Orum [1989] 1 WLR 88; Marsh v Arscott (1982) 75 Cr App R 211; The People v Murray [1977] IR 360; The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v Cagney [2007] IESC 46......
-
Robert Lukaszewski v Polish Judicial Authority
...approach as to whether different statements to police officers would amount to an offence under section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986. In DPP v Orum [1989] 1 WLR 88, where there was consideration as to whether a police officer could be the victim of an offence pursuant to section 5, Glidew......
-
Clifford (appellant accused) v DPP (respondent prosecutor)
...(PUBLIC ORDER) ACT 1994 S6(1) R v HOWELL (ERROL) 1981 73 CR APP R 31 THORPE v DPP 2007 1 IR 502 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1964 S4 DPP v ORUM 1989 1 WLR 88 PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1936 (UK) JORDAN v BURGOYNE 1963 2 QB 744 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1984 S13(1) CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1984 S11 CRIMINAL JUSTICE AC......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Section 5 Of The Public Order Act 1986: The Impact Of Harvey v DPP
...to mean the officers were likely to have been caused harassment, alarm or distress. He repeated that which was stated in DPP v Orum [1988] 3 All ER 449 about swear words being "wearisomely familiar". That is not to say that police officers can never be harassed, alarmed or distressed, as so......
5 books & journal articles
-
Sticks, Stones and Words: Emotional Harm and the English Criminal Law
...[2006] EWHC 1375 (Admin), (2006) 170 JP 661.71 Ibid. at [11] (Toulson J).72 Ibid. at [12].73 Ibid. at [13].74 Ibid. at [10]; DPP v Orum [1989] 1 WLR 88 at 93.75 [2001] EWHC Admin 1125, (2002) 166 JP 93. One cannot read this case withoutbeing reminded of Marty Robbins ‘Song of the Patriot’, ......
-
Public Order Act 1986, S. 5: Religiously Aggravated Behaviour
...for their decision bythe magistrates was that ‘the only persons present’ were ‘both servingpolice officers’. The case of DPP v Orum [1988] 3 All ER 449, DC,established that the accused must take the victim as he finds him andthat it could not be presumed that a police officer could not b......
-
Public Order Act 1986, S. 5: Lawfulness of Arrest; Police Act 1996, S. 89(2): Resisting Police Constable in the Execution of Duty
...such a finding, this would haveplaced a significant burden on the police officer to anticipate the findingsof the court.DPP v Orum [1988] 3 All ER 449, DC also discussed lawfulness ofarrest in the context of s. 5(4) of the 1986 Act. It was held in Orum thata constable could not be presu......
-
Swearing and s. 5 of the Public Order Act 1986
...doi:10.1350/jcla.2013.77.2.823 Swearing and s. 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 Order Act 1986. The central question in DPP v Orum [1988] 3 All ER 449was whether a police officer could be a person likely to be causedharassment, alarm or distress by threatening, abusive or insulting wordsand/o......
Request a trial to view additional results