DPP v Powell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1993
Date1993
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • DPP v David John Murray
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 25 October 2001
    ...the law could, in the particular circumstances, constitute a special reason. She referred to the decision of this court in DPP v Powell (1993) RTR 266 and submitted that ignorance of the law, particularly as to whether or not a conveyance is to be construed as a motor vehicle, is capable of......
  • Magistracy Appeal judgment no. HCMA159/2008
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 13 June 2008
    ...13. 還有,裁判官引用典籍,指故意不續保者,斷不能依賴「特別理由」來避免停牌,在原則上沒錯。然而,在每個個案背後,我們都得問問細節。例如,英國法院就在DPP v. Powell [1993] R.T.R. 266裏指出,一名父親在修理過他四歲兒子的玩具摩托車並作測試時,有理由相信自己無須為此事而像開一般摩托車地先購買第三者保險。 14. 同樣,我認爲,把汽車長期留置在停車場而沒有使用意圖的人,有理由相信無須為車輛繼續辦理牌照及第三者保險。這固然是故意的,也抵觸法律(如果停車場真的可被視作道路的話),但根據DPP v....

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT