DPP v Rogers
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1953 |
| Year | 1953 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
22 cases
-
R v McCormack
... ... Whipp and The Director of Public Prosecutions v. Rogers, cases which have shown that where the accused adult invites a child, for example, to touch his private parts, but exercises no sort of compulsion and there is no hostile act, the charge of indecent assault is not appropriate. But, in our view, that line of authorities has no application here, and, ... ...
-
R v Sutton (Terence)
... ... The cases to be referred to are Beal and Kelley, 35 Criminal Appeal Reports, page 120; Fairclough and Whipp, 35 Criminal Appeal Reports, page 138; Burrows, 35 Criminal Appeal Reports, page 180 and finally The Director of Public Prosecutions against Rogers, 1953 1 Weekly Law Reports, page 1017 ... 7 All these four cases involved children. In the first there was a hostile act. In the second and third there was merely an invitation to the child to touch the accused but no touching of the child by the accused or other hostile act by ... ...
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v F.B.
...courts in England and Wales, notably in in Beal v. Kelley (1951) 35 Cr. App. R. 128 DC, R, v. Burrows (1951) 35 Cr. App. R. 180 CCA; DPP v. Rogers (1953) 37 Cr. App. R. 137 DC. However, Lord Goddard L.C.J.'s remark that, “[i]t might be a very good thing if parliament passed an Act providin......
-
B. (A Minor) v DPP
...class of offence, or at any rate of undesirable conduct, had been overlooked. In Fairclough v. Whipp [1951] 2 All ER 834 and DPP v. Rogers [1953] 2 All ER 644, the Court had held that there cannot be an indecent assault unless there is an assault. This meant in cases where the defendant had......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
The Need to Kill Off Zombie Law
...Act 1922, s.1 and before that the Criminal LawAmendment Act 1880, s.2 (under-13s).16. At 139–140. It should be noted that the report at [1953] 1 WLR 1017 is rather shorter and omits the words ‘Here no force wasused and nothing was done except what any father may do.’ It is not known whether......