DPP v Smith

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year2000
Date2000
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 cases
  • Taylor v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • October 20, 2009
    ...“breath difference” and why there was a significant difference in the two tests. 14 In my judgment, this case is similar to that in DPP v Smith (Robert James) [2000] RTL 341. There, the breath test on the intoximeter at the police station recorded 43 and 33 milligrams of alcohol in a 100 mi......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Preliminary Sections
    • August 29, 2015
    ...Smith (Nicholas Paul) v DPP [1992] RTR 413, DC! 251 .......... Smith (Robert James), DPP v [1999] EWHC 836, [2000] RTR 341, DC! 54 , 78 . Smith (Roger), R v [1975] AC 476, [1974] 2 WLR 1, [1973] 3 All ER 1109, HL! 411 Smith (Stephen John Henry) v DPP [2007] EWHC 100 (Admin), .....................
  • The Requirement to Provide Specimens
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Contents
    • August 29, 2015
    ...a blood specimen; he could instead offer to take, or require, further breath specimens. DPP v Smith (Robert James) [1999] EWHC 836, [2000] RTR 341, 25 November 1999, QBD (DC) Relying on the table of breath difference ranges in form MG DD/A and B provides reasonable cause to believe that a b......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT