DPP v Watkins

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1989
Year1989
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 cases
  • Drake v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • April 4, 1994
  • Crown Prosecution Service v John Bate
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • November 22, 2004
    ...1375, footnote 5, of Stone's Justices' Manual 2004. The footnote was a summary and paraphrase of guidance given by this court in DPP v Watkins [1989] QB 821 at page 831, considering Section 6 of the Road Traffic Act 1972, the predecessor of section 5 of the 1988 Act. 7 It is instructive, I ......
  • Sheldrake v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • October 14, 2004
  • Gordon Orrock V. Procurator Fiscal, Perth
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • November 13, 2008
    ...been made a criminal offence to be in charge of a car in that condition. Taylor LJ was right in Director of Public Prosecutions v Watkins [1989] QB 821 at p.829) that 'the mischief aimed at is to prevent driving when unfit through drink.'" [21] Section 5(2) however provides a defence to an ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Preliminary Sections
    • August 29, 2015
    ...p Henshaw ...................................................................................... ! [1996] COD 346, DC! 549 Watkins, DPP v [1989] QB 821, [1989] 2 WLR 966, [1989] 1 All ER 1126, .............................................................................. ! [1989] RTR 324, D......
  • Definitions
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Contents
    • August 29, 2015
    ...of reasonable excuse …” Appeal in respect of the s 5(2) offence dismissed; appeal in respect of the s 8(7) offence allowed. DPP v Watkins [1989] QB 821, [1989] 2 WLR 966, [1989] 1 All ER 1126, [1989] RTR 324, 1 March 1989, QBD (DC) Where a person is not the owner, lawful possessor or recent......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT