Duck v Mayeu

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1892
Date1892

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
49 cases
  • ACC Bank Plc v Malocco
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 7 February 2000
    ...LAW OF CONTRACT 9ED 527 CUTLER V MCPHAIL 1962 2 QB 292 CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S17(1) MURPHY V J DONOHOE LTD 1993 IR 527 DUCK V MAYEU 1892 2 QB 511 CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S17(2) CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S35(1)(h) KERR ON CIVIL LIABILITY ACTS 1961–1964 39 WILLIAMS JOINT TORTS & CONTRIBU......
  • Gardiner v Moore
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Accordingly, the effect of the two written agreements was not also to discharge the author (post, p. 821A–D ) ... Duck v. Mayeu [ 1892 ] 2 Q.B. 511 and Apley Estates Co. Ltd. v. De Bernales [ 1947 ] Ch. 217 ; 63 T.L.R. 71 ; [ 1947 ] 1 All E.R ... ...
  • Apley Estates Company Ltd v De Bernales
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • Murphy v J. Donohoe Ltd
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1993
    ...LIABILITY ACT 1961 S16(2) CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S35(1)(h) CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S22 MERRYWEATHER V NIXAN 101 ER 1337 DUCK V MAYEU 1892 2 QB 511 CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S17(1) CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S17(2) CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S16(3) CIVIL LIABILITY ACT 1961 S35 Synopsis: ACTIO......
  • Get Started for Free