Duke v GEC Reliance (formerly Reliance Systems)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Date | 1982 |
| Year | 1982 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Park Cakes Ltd v Shumba and Others
...they were concerned with rather different issues from the present case, and I need only review the more recent authorities. 27 In Duke v Reliance Systems Ltd [1982] ICR 449 the employer had had a policy for many years of requiring female clerical employees to retire at the age of 60; but th......
-
Garratt v Mirror Group Newspapers
...that the approach was different when considering an established practice within a single organisation. 27 In Duke v Reliance Systems Ltd [1982] ICR 449, EAT the employer was seeking to imply a contractual normal retiring age of 60. At page 452 Browne-Wilkinson J put the matter (at 452) in t......
-
Waite v Government Communications Headquarters
...expressed or to be implied, it is impossible to establish that there is any normal retiring age. But in Duke v. Reliance Systems Ltd. [1982] I.C.R. 449, where there was no express contractual retiring age, the Employment Appeal Tribunal took a more flexible view. Browne-Wilkinson J., delive......
-
Sea Containers Services Ltd ((in Liquidation)), Sea Containers Ltd ((in Liquidation)), 0438490 Travel Ltd ((in Liquidation)), 1882420 Ltd ((in Liquidation)) & S.C. Maritime Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and Another
...or 'service credit'. The details of precisely how it worked are irrelevant for the present purposes. 5 Duke v Reliant Systems Ltd [1982] ICR 449 and Quinn v Calder Industrial Metals Ltd [1996] IRLR 126 6 Rule 1(h). 7 Special promise £60 plus actual benefits £130. ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Contract Law
...will be found to imply a term. This proposition was derived from a case cited by the plaintiff, viz, Duke v Reliance Systems LtdICR[1982] ICR 449 at 452. 11.43 It is, however, important to recognise that Duke v Reliance Systems Ltd concerned an employment situation; specifically, the questi......