Dumbell v Roberts
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1944 |
| Year | 1944 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
202 cases
- Daud; Mohamed Lajan
-
Rookes v Barnard
...Bowen L.J. in Whitham v. Kershaw (1885) 16 Q.B.D. 613 at 618 and in Finlay v. Chirney (1888) 20 Q.B.D. 494 at 504 and by Scott L.J. in Dumbell v. Roberts [1944] 1 All E.R., 326, at 330. McCardie J. in Butterworth v. Butterworth [1920] p. 126 also obiter, expounded the principle. There are......
- R (Raissi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
-
Hussien v Chong Fook Kam
... ... Dumbell v. Roberts [ 1944 ] 1 All E.R. 326 , 329, C.A. and McArdle v. Egan ( 1934 ) 150 L.T. 412 , C.A. approved ... (3) That, accepting ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Court of Appeal
...to hold that the appellants had the burden ofThe Journal of Criminal Law120 proof with regards to self-defence (Dumbell v Roberts [1944] 1 All ER 326;Cresswell v Sirl [1948] 1 KB 241; Dallison v Caffery [1965] 1 QB 348).None of these cases actually concerned self-defence. However, in Cress-......
-
Table of cases
...255 Downing v Capel (1867), LR 2 CP 461 .............................................................. 253 Dumbell v Roberts, [1944] 1 All ER 326 (CA) ....................................................251 Eccles v Bourque (1974), [1975] 2 SCR 739, 50 DLR (3d) 753, [1974] SCJ No 123.............
-
Unchecked power: the constitutional regulation of arrest reconsidered.
...R. v. Storrey, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 241 at 249-51, 53 C.C.C. (3d) 316 [Storrey cited to S.C.R.], quoting with approval Dumbell v. Roberts, [1944] 1 All E.R. 326 at 329 (C.A.) (4) See Bruce P. Archibald, "The Law of Arrest" in Vincent M. Del Buono, ed., Criminal Procedure in Canada: Studies (Toro......
-
Reasonable and Probable Grounds
...have reasonable and probable grounds for making an arrest and the need to limit its scope was well expressed in Dumbell v. Roberts , [1944] 1 All E.R. 326 (C.A.), wherein Scott L.J. stated at p. 329: That [reasonable grounds] requirement is very limited. The police are not called on before ......