Duncliffe v Caerfelin Properties Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1989 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Smith v Muscat
...whom the term is from time to time vested … 13 Mr Nicol accepts for the purposes of his argument the decision of Garland J in Duncliffe v Caerfelin Properties Ltd [1989] 2 EGLR 38. The defendants were assignees of the reversion of a flat held on a long lease, the assignors having gone into ......
-
Edlington Properties Ltd v J H Fenner and Company Ltd
...appears to me to be contrary to principle. Indeed the contention is difficult to reconcile with the decision of Garland J in Duncliffe v Caerfelin Properties Ltd [1989] 2 EGLR 38. That decision, which is rightly accepted as correctly decided by Mr Lundie, and was also so treated by Buxton L......
-
Drake City Ltd v Tasman-Jones
...to principle. Indeed the contention is difficult to reconcile with the decision of Garland J in Duncliffe v Caerfelin Properties Ltd [1989] 2 EGLR 38. That decision, which is rightly accepted as correctly decided by Mr Lundie, and was also so treated by Buxton LJ in Muscat v Smith [2003] 1......
-
Lawrence Riverside Limited v C P Holdings Limited
...there is no claim for arrears of rent now being advanced by the second defendant. 6 There was a Dunncliffe v Caerfelin Properties Ltd [1989] 2 EGLR 38, judgment of Garland J in the Queen’s Bench Division on 7 September 1987. Dunncliffe was approved in Edlington Properties Ltd v J H Fenner &......
Request a trial to view additional results