Dunhill (Alfred) Ltd v Sunoptic SA
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1979 |
| Date | 1979 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
85 cases
- Cheng Hang Guan and Others v Perumahan Farlim (Penang) Sdn Bhd and Others
- Kassim Sulong and Another as The Liquidators of 10 Companies v Guthrie Estates Holdings Ltd and Others
- Davidson and Others; Yamamori (Hong Kong) Ltd
- Abdul Razak Ahmad v Majlis Bandaraya Johor Bahru
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Interlocutory injunctions: revisiting the three-pronged test.
...I use that phraseology because counsel for the plaintiffs referred us to the decision of this court in Alfred Dunhill Ltd v Sunoptic SA [1979] FSR 337 at 373, where Megaw LJ said that in the application of the Cyanamid test it did not matter whether the chances of success in establishing li......
-
RATIONALISING AND SIMPLIFYING THE PRESUMPTION OF SIMILARITY OF LAWS
...for the relief sought (within the meaning of O 8 r 2(2)(c) of the Federal Court Rules 1976). 67[1999] QB 674. 68Alfred Dunhill v Sunoptic[1979] FSR 337; Waterford v David Nagli[1998] FSR 92. For a Singapore case, see OMG Holdings Pte Ltd v Pos Ad Sdn Bhd[2012] 4 SLR 69[2001] NSWCA 87. 70 Th......
-
NET EFFECT II: MARKED_CONCERN.COM
...Conflict of Laws” (12th ed.), Rule 203; Walker (John) & Sons Ltd v Henry Ost & Co. Ltd[1970] 1 WLR 917; Alfred Dunhill Ltd v Sunoptic SA[1979] FSR 337. See also O. 11, r. 1(f), RC. 82 [1997] FSR 627. 83 Ibid, at p. 640. 84 More information about the plan and its prior and subsequent history......