Dunkley v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1994 |
| Year | 1994 |
| Date | 1994 |
| Court | Privy Council |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
31 cases
-
John Mitchell v The Queen
...like the present under consideration the approach to be followed is to be found in the judgment of the Board in Dunkley v. The Queen [1995] 1 A.C. 419 at page 428:- "In the first place where counsel appearing for a defendant on a capital charge seeks leave to withdraw during the course of ......
-
Hinds v Attorney General of Barbados and another
...or render a hearing necessarily unfair. He relied on decisions of this Board in Robinson v The Queen [1985] AC 956 at 965-966 and Dunkley v The Queen [1995] 1 AC 419 at 429 and to similar rulings in other jurisdictions: Re Ewing and The Queen (1974) 49 DLR (3d) 619; R v Rowbotham 41 (1988......
-
Grant v State
...of the Constitution was held by the Board in Robinson v The Queen [1985] AC 956 to be not an absolute right, a decision followed in Dunkley v The Queen [1995] 1 AC 419 and, more recently, in Jahree v The State [2005] UKPC 7, [2005] 1 WLR 19 Fifthly, it is clear that the English courts h......
-
Tan Chor Jin v Public Prosecutor
...had occurred (cf the dissenting judgment of Lord Scarman and Lord Edmund-Davies (id at 969–974)). 62 In Errol Dunkley v The Queen [1995] 1 AC 419, Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle, delivering the judgment of the Privy Council, held (at 427) that “there [was] no absolute right to legal represent......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Administrative and Constitutional Law
...Chor Jin’) at [59]. From a reading of three Privy Council decisions from Jamaica (Frank Robinson v R[1985] 1 AC 956; Errol Dunkley v R[1995] 1 AC 419 and Delroy Ricketts v R[1998] 1 WLR 1016) and the Singapore case of Balasundaram v PP[1996] 2 SLR 331 (discussed in Tan Chor Jin, at [58]), t......
-
Table of cases
...v. Bolduc), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 374, 78 D.L.R. (4th) 666, 124 N.R. 1, [1991] R.D.I. 239, 39 Q.A.C. 81................. 68 Dunkley v. R., [1995] 1 All E.R. 279 (P.C.)......................................................... 173 Edwards v. People of State of California, 314 U.S. 160 (1941).............
-
Termination of the Client-Lawyer Relationship
...client in the lurch by withdrawing in response to a clash with the trial judge, in a murder trial at that, see Dunkley v. R. (1994), [1995] 1 All E.R. 279 (P.C.) [Dunkley]. 24 See Swartz, above note 23 at 482. Termination of the Client-Lawyer Relationship 597 defence counsel. Accordingly, c......
-
Criminal Lawyers: Putting Up a Defence
...Dist. C.A. 1985). 15 Re Ontario (Crime Commission) , (1963), 37 D.L.R. (2d) 382 at 391 (Ont. C.A.), McLennan J.A. 16 Dunkley v. R. , [1995] 1 All E.R. 279 (P.C.). LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY 174 as to elicit truthful answers and thereby correct the false evidence. In summin......