Dunkley v The Queen

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1994
Year1994
Date1994
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
30 cases
  • John Mitchell v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 28 June 1999
    ...like the present under consideration the approach to be followed is to be found in the judgment of the Board in Dunkley v. The Queen [1995] 1 A.C. 419 at page 428:- "In the first place where counsel appearing for a defendant on a capital charge seeks leave to withdraw during the course of ......
  • Hinds v Attorney General of Barbados and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 5 December 2001
    ...or render a hearing necessarily unfair. He relied on decisions of this Board in Robinson v The Queen [1985] AC 956 at 965-966 and Dunkley v The Queen [1995] 1 AC 419 at 429 and to similar rulings in other jurisdictions: Re Ewing and The Queen (1974) 49 DLR (3d) 619; R v Rowbotham 41 (1988......
  • Grant v State
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 16 January 2006
    ...of the Constitution was held by the Board in Robinson v The Queen [1985] AC 956 to be not an absolute right, a decision followed in Dunkley v The Queen [1995] 1 AC 419 and, more recently, in Jahree v The State [2005] UKPC 7, [2005] 1 WLR 19 Fifthly, it is clear that the English courts h......
  • Tan Chor Jin v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 18 July 2008
    ...had occurred (cf the dissenting judgment of Lord Scarman and Lord Edmund-Davies (id at 969–974)). 62 In Errol Dunkley v The Queen [1995] 1 AC 419, Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle, delivering the judgment of the Privy Council, held (at 427) that “there [was] no absolute right to legal represent......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...Chor Jin’) at [59]. From a reading of three Privy Council decisions from Jamaica (Frank Robinson v R[1985] 1 AC 956; Errol Dunkley v R[1995] 1 AC 419 and Delroy Ricketts v R[1998] 1 WLR 1016) and the Singapore case of Balasundaram v PP[1996] 2 SLR 331 (discussed in Tan Chor Jin, at [58]), t......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility. Second Edition
    • 15 June 2006
    ...v. Bolduc), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 374, 78 D.L.R. (4th) 666, 124 N.R. 1, [1991] R.D.I. 239, 39 Q.A.C. 81................. 68 Dunkley v. R., [1995] 1 All E.R. 279 (P.C.)......................................................... 173 Edwards v. People of State of California, 314 U.S. 160 (1941).............
  • Termination of the Client-Lawyer Relationship
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Ethics and Canadian Criminal Law
    • 26 August 2001
    ...client in the lurch by withdrawing in response to a clash with the trial judge, in a murder trial at that, see Dunkley v. R. (1994), [1995] 1 All E.R. 279 (P.C.) [Dunkley]. 24 See Swartz, above note 23 at 482. Termination of the Client-Lawyer Relationship 597 defence counsel. Accordingly, c......
  • Criminal Lawyers: Putting Up a Defence
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility. Second Edition
    • 15 June 2006
    ...Dist. C.A. 1985). 15 Re Ontario (Crime Commission) , (1963), 37 D.L.R. (2d) 382 at 391 (Ont. C.A.), McLennan J.A. 16 Dunkley v. R. , [1995] 1 All E.R. 279 (P.C.). LEGAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY 174 as to elicit truthful answers and thereby correct the false evidence. In summin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT