Dunnachie v Kingston upon Hull City Council; Williams v Southampton Institute; Dawson v Stonham Housing Association
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 22 May 2003 |
| Date | 22 May 2003 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Dunnachie v Kingston upon Hull City Council
...when allowing an appeal by Mr Christopher Dunnachie from the decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (The Times June 9, 2003; (2003) ICR 1294) allowing the appeal of Kingston upon Hull City Council against an award of Pounds 10,000 made by an employment tribunal for injury to his feeling......
-
Dunnachie v Kingston upon Hull City Council
...construction of section 123 of the 1996 Act it did not allow recovery for non-economic loss: Dunnachie v Kingston upon Hull City Council [2003] ICR 1294. The EAT granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal. The other two appeals were settled before the hearing of the appeal in the Court ......
-
Dunnachie v. Kingston-upon-Hull City Council, [2004] N.R. Uned. 147 (HL)
...of section 123 of the 1996 Act it did not allow recovery for non-economic loss: Dunnachie v. Kingston upon Hull City Council [2003] I.C.R. 1294. The EAT granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal. The other two appeals were settled before the hearing of the appeal in the Court of Appeal......
-
BMI Healthcare Ltd v Mr M Shoukrey
...and what will now happen. Mr Laddie adopted Burton J’s naming of these scenarios in Kingston-upon-Hull City Council v. Dunnachie (No.3) [2004] ICR 227 as “old job facts” and “new job facts”. As the different scenarios may not involve a change of job, we G prefer to refer to the “what would ......
Request a trial to view additional results