Durabella Ltd v J. Jarvis & Sons Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year2001
Date2001
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Globe Engineering Sdn Bhd v Bina Jati Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Re Interlink Overseas Trading LLC
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 4 d5 Novembro d5 2005
    ...company or to its order as a result. 28 In support of that submission, she referred me to the case of Durabella Ltd v J Jarvis & Sons Ltd 83 Con LR 145, where His Honour Judge Humphrey Lloyd QC at page 154 (paragraph 18) said in relation to the operation of a pay when paid provision in a co......
  • Antah Schindler Sdn Bhd v Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd., 03-03-2008
    • Malaysia
    • Unspecified court (Malaysia)
    • 3 d1 Março d1 2008
    ...act, activity or inactivity or unholy collusions deliberately set up to defeat the plaintiff’s claim (Durabella Ltd v J Jarvis & Sons Ltd 83 Con LR 145). To wind up this judgment, based on the above reasons, we had unanimously allowed the appeal with costs here and below. Order in terms was......
  • Honor Engineering Ltd v Hing Fat Machinery & Electrical Engineering Co Ltd
    • Hong Kong
    • District Court (Hong Kong)
    • 17 d5 Abril d5 2015
    ...on a “pay-when-paid” clause if the reason for non-payment is its own breach of contract or default: Durabella Ltd v J Jarvis & Sons Ltd 83 ConLR 145 at paragraph 17 perHis Honour Judge Humphrey Lloyd QC. I find that any refusal or failure on the part of REC to pay the VO claims to the defen......
1 books & journal articles
  • Contract formation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 13 d1 Abril d1 2020
    ...LJ; Skilled Group Ltd v CSR Viridian Pty Ltd [2012] VSC 290 at [159]–[171], per Vickery J. Compare Durabella Ltd v J Jarvis & Sons Ltd (2001) 83 Con LR 145 at 150–151 [8], per HHJ LLoyd QC. 35 Crowshaw v Pritchard (1899) Hudson’s BC (4th edition, volume 2) 274 at 277, per Bigham J; Trustees......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT