Earl of Antrim's Petition; Committee for Priveleges
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1966 |
Year | 1966 |
Court | House of Lords (England) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
- Johnson Tan Han Seng v PP and Soon Seng Sia Heng v PP and PP v Chea Soon Hoong and Teh Cheng Poh v PP
-
Allister (James Hugh) et al’s Application AND In the matter of the Protocol NI
...has been considered the House of Lords has determined that the Act of Union had been impliedly repealed – see Earl of Antrim and others [1967] 1 AC 691. That case involved a petition by 12 Irish peers seeking a declaration that the peerage of Ireland had a right under the 1800 Act to be rep......
-
James Hugh Allister, Benyamin Naeem Habib, Steve Aiken, The Rt Hon. Arlene Isobel Foster, Baroness Catharine Hoey of Lylehill and Rathlin and William David, The Rt Hon. Baron Trimble of Lisnagarvey and Secretary of State for Nothern Ireland and Clifford Peeples and (1) The Prime Minister (2) Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (3) Chancellor of The Duchy of Lancaster
...Free State in 1922. In that respect, Keegan LCJ referred to the majority speech of Viscount Dilhorne in the Earl of Antrim and others [1967] 1 AC 691, 719E which stated that “[when] the Free State and Northern Ireland were created, Ireland as an entity ceased to be part of the United Kingd......
-
James Hugh Allister, Benyamin Naeem Habib, Steve Aiken, The Rt Hon. Arlene Isobel Foster, Baroness Catharine Hoey of Lylehill and Rathlin and William David, The Rt Hon. Baron Trimble of Lisnagarvey and Secretary of State for Nothern Ireland and Clifford Peeples and (1) The Prime Minister (2) Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (3) Chancellor of The Duchy of Lancaster
...Free State in 1922. In that respect, Keegan LCJ referred to the majority speech of Viscount Dilhorne in the Earl of Antrim and others [1967] 1 AC 691, 719E which stated that “[when] the Free State and Northern Ireland were created, Ireland as an entity ceased to be part of the United Kingd......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Withdrawn: Knighthoods and the Order of Australia
...exception, and if so it may well be the exception that proves the rule, foraccording to their Lordships in Re Earl of Antrim’s Petition [1967] 1 AC 691, 716, 719, Ireland has simply ceased toexist (and therefore can no longer be represented in the House of Lords), making its lack of an hono......
1 provisions
-
House of Lords Act 1999
...time of the passing of that Act remained members until their death (see The Petition of the Earl of Antrim and eleven other Irish peers [1967] A.C. p. 691). The House of Lords Act does not change the position of peers of Ireland. 2 Section 6 (1) makes it clear that ‘hereditary peerage’ incl......