Earl of Mexborough v Whitwood Urban District Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1897
Date1897

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • Mascherpa v Direct Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 21 March 1960
    ...them on the forfeiture matter should cover them as to the counterclaim. They rely on what was said by this court in Earl of Mexborough v. Whitwood Urban District Council (1897 2 Queen's Bench Division, at page 111). I draw attention to the date of that case because, of course, it was after ......
  • Seddon v Commercial Salt Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
    ... ... in Earl of Powis v. Negus [ 1923 ] 1 Ch. 186 made ... Earl of Mexborough v. Whitwood Urban Council [ 1897 ] 2 Q. B ... ...
  • Rio Tinto Zinc Corporation v Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Re Westinghouse Electric Corporation Uranium Contract Litigation M.D.L. Docket No. 235 (No. 1) and (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 1 December 1977
    ... ... Rogatory issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern District, Richmond ... ...
  • Istel (AT & T) Ltd v Tully
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 November 1991
    ...in actions for penalties or in proceedings to enforce a forfeiture of an estate in land, though it may be noted that in Mexborough v. Whitford U.D.C. [1897] 2 Q.B. 111 Lord Esher M.R. at 115 regarded the three rules as quite separate from each other. It is sufficient to refer to the stateme......
  • Get Started for Free