Earl of Mexborough v Whitwood Urban District Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1897
Date1897
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
28 cases
  • Trade Practices Commission v Abbco Ice Works Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Mascherpa v Direct Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 21 March 1960
    ...them on the forfeiture matter should cover them as to the counterclaim. They rely on what was said by this court in Earl of Mexborough v. Whitwood Urban District Council (1897 2 Queen's Bench Division, at page 111). I draw attention to the date of that case because, of course, it was after ......
  • Istel (AT & T) Ltd v Tully
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 November 1991
    ...penalties or in proceedings to enforce a forfeiture of an estate in land, though it may be noted that in Mexborough v. Whitford U.D.C. [1897] 2 Q.B. 111 Lord Esher M.R. at 115 regarded the three rules as quite separate from each other. It is sufficient to refer to the statement of the broa......
  • Patrick David Belton v The Director of the Assets Recovery Agency
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland)
    • 27 January 2006
    ...on the grounds that they offend the rules enunciated by the Court of Appeal in Mexborough (Earl of) v Whitwood Urban District Council [1897] 2 QB 111 in that the respondent’s claim against the appellant (if successful) is an action constituting a penalty against the appellant. Lord Esher MR......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT