Earl of Stamford against Nedham
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1793 |
Date | 01 January 1793 |
Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 83 E.R. 348
COURT OF KING'S BENCH
[160] earl of stamford against nedham. On an elegit, the moiety of every part is to be delivered. S. C. ante 56. " 1 Sid. 239. 1 Keb. 858. By the Court, if the sheriff on an inquisition upon an elegit, returns the defendant to have twenty acres in Dale, and twenty acres in Sale; and delivers the twenty acres in Sale for the moiety of the whole, all is void ; for he ought to deliver a moiety of the twenty acres in each vill; and this might be avoided in evidence in ejectment brought for the lands.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Underhill v Devereux
...by the said writ and inquisition remaining in our Court before us here of record (3) more jury : and tha case of Lord Stamford v. Nedham, 1 Lev. 160, was denied. Doug. 473, Den v. Earl of Abingdon. So in Bro. Elegit, 14, it is said by Littleton, that where an elegit issues against one who h......
-
Kirkwood v Lloyd
...KIRKWOOD and LLOYD. Fenny v. DuranENR 1 B. & Ald. 40. Denn v. The Earl of AbingdonENR 2 Doug. 473. Earl of Stamford v. NedhamENR 1 Lev. 160. Hanger v. Fry Cro Eliz. 310. Hunger v. Frey F. Moor. 341. White v. White 3 Ir. Law Rep. 118, n. Martin v. M'Causland 3 Ir. Law Rep. 113. Farrell v. Gl......