Earles v Barclays Bank Plc

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date08 October 2009
Neutral Citation[2009] EWHC 2500 (QB)
Date08 October 2009
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Queen's Bench Division

Before Judge Simon Brown, QC

Earles
and
Barclays Bank plc
Disclosing electronic data

Although there was no duty on parties to preserve documents before proceedings commenced, after that the situation was radically different.

Judge Simon Brown, QC, sitting as an additional Queen's Bench Division judge at Birmingham District Registry, so stated on October 8, 2009, in dismissing the claim by Timothy Duncan Earles against Barclays Bank plc.

HIS LORDSHIP said that this was the type of action between a customer and his bank that had become increasingly prevalent in the mercantile court during the economic downturn and banking credit crisis.

Over 90 per cent of business documentation was now in electronic form and was subject to disclosure under rule 31.4 of the Civil Procedure Rules and paragraph 2A of the Practice Direction thereto.

In a short trial of a simple factual issue, the fair award for costs for a successful defendant with in-house counsel who had failed to disclose material, particularly electronic material, relevant to the primary issue in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Nobu Su (aka Su Hsin Chi; aka Nobu Morimoto)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 8 Julio 2021
    ...of the evidence, any such failure as not supporting a premise contended for on behalf of a party”. 907 In Earles v. Barclays Bank Plc [2009] EWHC 2500 (Mercantile); [2010] Bus. L.R. 566, Judge Simon Brown QC stated by reference to a failure to disclose documents at [37]: “In cases where the......
  • Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Azitio Holdings Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 14 Julio 2020
    ...documents which should in fairness be used “to fill the evidential gap and so establish a positive case”: Earles v Barclays Bank Plc [2009] EWHC 2500 (Merc) at [37]. However, this approach applies only where there is a “deliberate void of 143 A number of reasons were given for the gaps in t......
  • E D & F Man Capital Markets Ltd v Come Harvest Holdings Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 16 Febrero 2022
    ...favour: Hollander on Documentary Evidence (13th ed.), 11–23 to 11–27. 135 I agree with the approach adopted in Earles v Barclays Bank [2009] EWHC 2500, which also deals with the failure to call relevant witnesses, where HHJ Simon Brown QC stated that: “28… in this jurisdiction as in Austral......
  • Active Media Services Inc. v Burmester, Duncker & Joly GmbH & Company KG
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 9 Febrero 2021
    ...the deliberate destruction of documents and a deliberate void of evidence. I agree with the approach adopted in Earles v Barclays Bank [2009] EWHC 2500, which also deals with the failure to call relevant witnesses, where HHJ Simon Brown QC stated that: “28… in this jurisdiction as in Austra......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Unfair Contract Terms in Financial Services Consumer Contracts
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 17 Noviembre 2010
    ...[2009] UKSC 6 Office of Fair Trading v Foxtons [2009] EWHC 1681 (Ch), 10 July 2009, (Mann J) Timothy Duncan Earles v Barclays Bank plc [2009] EWHC 2500 Erherd Eschig v HNIQ Sachversicherung AG (C-199/08) www.lg-legal.com The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to ......
4 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT