East and West India Dock Company v Hill

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHouse of Lords
Date1882
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
31 cases
  • Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 22 February 1996
    ...own only because I have found the case to be one of some difficulty. 6At an early stage of the hearing I formed the view that Hill v. East and West India Dock Co. (1884) 9 App. Cas. 448, and Stacey v. Hill [1901] 1 Q.B. 660, could not well stand together, despite Sir Robert Megarry V.-C.'s ......
  • Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 15 June 1994
    ...... Act 1986 by the liquidator of a company which has taken an assignment of the lease ...This was decided in Stacey v. Hill [1901] 1 KB 660 , a decision of this Court. Two ...East & West India Dock Company (1884) 9 AC 448 . That ......
  • Enmore Estates Ltd v D R Singh
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • Bradshaw v McMullan
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 24 April 1918
    ...... Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Company v. RicheELR L. R. 7 H. L. 653. ...P. Cases. Cornelius v. PhillipsELR [1918] A. C. 199, per Lord Finlay, C., at ...606. Gaskell v. KingENR 11 East, 165. Gedge v. Royal Exchange ...R. 49. Great North-West Central Railway Company v. CharleboisELR [1899] ...383. Hill v. East and West India Dock Company 9 A. C. 448. Howe v. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT