Eastern Telegraph Company v Dent
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1899 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Tan Soo Leng David v Wee, Satku & Kumar Pte Ltd and Another
...consent. See Lehmann v McArthur, [1868] LR 3 Ch App 496 Barrow v Isaacs & Son [1891] 1 QB 417 and Eastern Telegraph Co Ltd v Dent & Ors. [1899] 1 QB 835In Lehmann v McArthur 1 a lease contained the restriction that the lessee would not assign the lease without the previous consent in writin......
-
BG Global Energy Ltd (Formerly BG International (Nsw) Ltd) and Others v Talisman Sinopec Energy UK Ltd (Formerly Talisman Energy (UK) Ltd) and Others Talisman Sinopec North Sea Ltd (Seventh Party) Rigel Petroleum UK Ltd (Eighth Party)
...requires in seeking consent, the issue of reasonableness or unreasonableness in withholding consent simply does not arise. i) In Eastern Telegraph v Dent [1899] 1 QB 835, all three members of the Court of Appeal were clear on this point at pages 838–839 in the context of a breach of covenan......
-
Samuel Properties (Developments) Ltd v Hayek
...was due to forgetfulness, or whether the lease would have been sharply referred to the observations of Lord Justice Romer in Eastern Telegraph Co. v. Dent (1899) 1 Queen's Bench, p.835, at p.839. Be that as it may, for my part I do not consider that the failure to give proper notice here ca......
-
Hendry v Chartsearch Ltd
...refused it. The distinction between leases and contractual obligations simpliciter may be relevant here, and I note that in Eastern Telegraph Co. Ltd v. Dent [1899] 1 Q.B. 835 the purported assignee in fact had moved into occupation of the premises. I must emphasise, however, that I do not ......
Request a trial to view additional results