Eastern Telegraph Company v Dent

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1899
Year1899

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Tan Soo Leng David v Wee, Satku & Kumar Pte Ltd and Another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 11 February 1993
    ...consent. See Lehmann v McArthur, [1868] LR 3 Ch App 496 Barrow v Isaacs & Son [1891] 1 QB 417 and Eastern Telegraph Co Ltd v Dent & Ors. [1899] 1 QB 835In Lehmann v McArthur 1 a lease contained the restriction that the lessee would not assign the lease without the previous consent in writin......
  • Abrahams v Mac Fisheries Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Barrow v. Isaacs & Son [ 1891 ] 1 Q. B. 417 ; Eastern Telegraph Co. v. Dent [ 1899 ] 1 Q. B. 835 ; and Elliott v ... The lessees agreed with a company of wine merchants to grant them an underlease of one of the messuages and ... ...
  • Samuel Properties (Developments) Ltd v Hayek
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 July 1972
    ...was due to forgetfulness, or whether the lease would have been sharply referred to the observations of Lord Justice Romer in Eastern Telegraph Co. v. Dent (1899) 1 Queen's Bench, p.835, at p.839. Be that as it may, for my part I do not consider that the failure to give proper notice here ca......
  • Jamaica Edible Oils & Fats Company Ltd v MSA Tire (Jamaica) Ltd
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 27 March 2015
    ...Where the tenant fails to seek consent before the disposition, the landlord may take out an action for breach of covenant (See Eastern Telegraph Co. Ltd. v Dent [1899] 1 Q.B. 835 ). 22 It is a general principle of law that an entitlement to mesne profits does not rest in the landlord's enti......
  • Get Started for Free