Eastern Telegraph Company v Dent

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1899
Date1899
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Tan Soo Leng David v Wee, Satku & Kumar Pte Ltd and Another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 11 Febrero 1993
    ...consent. See Lehmann v McArthur, [1868] LR 3 Ch App 496 Barrow v Isaacs & Son [1891] 1 QB 417 and Eastern Telegraph Co Ltd v Dent & Ors. [1899] 1 QB 835In Lehmann v McArthur 1 a lease contained the restriction that the lessee would not assign the lease without the previous consent in writin......
  • Abrahams v Mac Fisheries Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Barrow v. Isaacs & Son [ 1891 ] 1 Q. B. 417 ; Eastern Telegraph Co. v. Dent [ 1899 ] 1 Q. B. 835 ; and Elliott v ... The lessees agreed with a company of wine merchants to grant them an underlease of one of the messuages and ... ...
  • Samuel Properties (Developments) Ltd v Hayek
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 Julio 1972
    ...was due to forgetfulness, or whether the lease would have been sharply referred to the observations of Lord Justice Romer in Eastern Telegraph Co. v. Dent (1899) 1 Queen's Bench, p.835, at p.839. Be that as it may, for my part I do not consider that the failure to give proper notice here ca......
  • Hendry v Chartsearch Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 Julio 1998
    ...employees” contracts. The following cases were referred to in the judgments: Barrow v Isaacs & SonELR [1891] 1 QB 417 Eastern Telegraph Co Ltd v DentELR [1899] 1 QB 835 Eshelby v Federated European Bank LtdELR [1932] 1 KB 254 Hurst v BrykWLR [1998] 2 WLR 269 International Drilling Fluids Lt......
  • Get Started for Free