Edge v DPP

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1993
Year1993
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • DPP v Jackson ; Stanley v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 29 July 1998
    ...to ask the medical question. We were referred to Anderton v. Lythgoe [1985] 1 W.L.R. 222 and Edge v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1993] R.T.R. 146. (j) We asked ourselves whether the law required a police officer in the face of a refusal to continue and ask a raft of irrelevant question......
  • Timothy Whitworth Gorman DPP and Another Paul Alfred Arnup
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 7 November 1996
    ...before the Court. I do not propose to rehearse them all. They include, in chronological order, the following: Edge-v-DPP, December 1992, 1993 RTR 146, Mead-v-DPP, December 1992, 1993 RTR 151, Murray-v-DPP, February 1993, 1993 RTR 209, Hayes-v-DPP, March 1993, 1994 RTR 163, Ogburn-v-DPP Janu......
  • DPP v Nesbitt ; DPP v Duffy ; Ogburn v DPP ; Williams v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 28 January 1994
    ...authorities, these provisions remain a source of difficulty. They were further considered by this Court in the cases of Edge v DPP [1993] RTR 146; Meade v DPP [1993] RTR 151; DPP v Winstanley [1993] RTR 222 and ( Hayes v DPP unrep. 12.3.93). 4 Before considering the questions raised in four......
  • DPP v Nesbitt ; DPP v Duffy ; Ogburn v DPP ; Williams v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 28 January 1994
    ...been made under section 7(3), for some other reason affording a reasonable excuse under the Act. Mr Lawson had argued that Edge v DPPUNK ((1993) RTR 146) and Meade v DPPUNK((1993) RTR 151) were wrongly decided and should not be followed. His argument was that Lord Bridge in DPP v Warren had......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Preliminary Sections
    • 29 August 2015
    ...DPP v [1991] RTR 35, [1990] Crim LR 428, DC! 244 ......................................................................... Edge v DPP [1993] RTR 146, QBD! 66 ....................... Edmond v DPP [2006] EWHC 463 (Admin), [2006] RTR 18, DC! 102 ......................................................
  • The Requirement to Provide Specimens
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Contents
    • 29 August 2015
    ...to question 3 was “yes”. Appeal allowed. For cases in which the principles established in DPP v Warren were applied, see Edge v DPP [1993] RTR 146; Meade v DPP [1993] RTR 151; Ogburn v DPP; Williams v DPP; DPP v Duffy; R v Cheshire JJ ex p Cunningham and Other Cases [1995] RTR 287; R v Ches......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT