Edge v Pensions Ombudsman

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date05 December 1997
Date05 December 1997
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
51 cases
  • Edge v Pensions Ombudsman
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 July 1999
    ...3 The underlying facts are fully set out by the Vice-Chancellor in the judgment which he handed down on 5 December 1997 (reported at [1998] Ch 512). It is sufficient to rehearse them in summary form: 4 (1) Industrial Training Boards ("ITBs") are corporate bodies established under the Indus......
  • Merchant Navy Ratings Pension and Another v Stena Line Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 25 February 2015
    ...no reasonable body of trustees properly directing themselves could have reached. See Sir Richard Scott V-C in Edge v Pensions Ombudsman [1998] Ch 512 at 534B to H as approved by the Court of Appeal at [2000] 3 WLR 79 at 100H to 103E. The court must also be satisfied that the trustee has in......
  • Sieff v Fox
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 23 June 2005
    ...a result of Edge v. Pensions Ombudsman [2000] Ch 602. In that case the Court of Appeal, affirming the decision of Sir Richard Scott, V-C, [1998] Ch 512, and following earlier decisions of the Court of Appeal including Harris v. Lord Shuttleworth (cited above, at paragraph 52), held that tr......
  • Henry Dominic Chicheley Thornton and Others v Mary Virginia Chicheley Woodhouse and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 10 April 2017
    ...with conflicts of interest are not prevented from acting because they have been placed in that position by the settlor, see Edge v Pensions Ombudsman [2000] Ch 602 at 631. (2) It is not unusual, indeed it is very common, for a spouse with a life interest in the residue of the estate to be a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Letters Of Wishes: Adequate Deliberations
    • Bermuda
    • Mondaq Bermuda
    • 27 October 2014
    ...3 June 2014. Pitt v Holt, Futter v Futter [2013] 2 A.C. 108. [1965] Ch 918. ibid 936. [1998] Ch 512. Edge v Pensions Ombudsman (C.A.) [2000] Ch 602, See (n 10) 536. For earlier formulations, see: In Re Hastings Bass [1975] 1 Ch 25, 41; Harris v Lord Shuttleworth [1994] I.C.R. 991, 999; Wild......
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Bermuda
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Offshore Commercial Law in Bermuda - 2nd Edition Preliminary Sections
    • 30 August 2018
    ...HL 22.41 DuPont Scandinavia AB (ARA-bolagen AB) v Coastal Bermuda [1987] Bda LR 74, Sup Ct of Bermuda 16.57 Edge v Pensions Ombudsman [1998] Ch 512, [1998] 3 WLR 466, [1998] 2 All ER 547, ChD 14.12 Edwards v Halliwell [1950] 2 All ER 1064, 94 SJ 803, [1950] WN 537, CA 9.33 Ehrhorn v Interna......
  • Trust Litigation in Bermuda
    • Bermuda
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Offshore Commercial Law in Bermuda - 2nd Edition Part III. Commercial dispute resolution
    • 30 August 2018
    ...Trust , n 3, above, for another example of an application by trustees for approval of a momentous decision. 6 Edge v Pensions Ombudsman [1998] Ch 512. Beddoe applications 14.13 One example of a momentous decision a trustee may be faced with is the decision whether to embark on or defend lit......
  • Using the Wrong Policy Tools: Education, Charity, and Public Benefit
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley Journal of Law and Society No. 39-4, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...trusteefunctions or being involved directly in a charity's administration.77 Borrowing in another context from Edge v. Pensions Ombudsman [1998] Ch 512, 533.78 Explicit requirements for access proposed for the Bill were consistently rejected: seeLord Phillips, 669 H.L. Debs. cols. GC111±113......
  • RECONCEPTUALISING FIDUCIARY REGULATION IN ACTUAL CONFLICTS.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 1, August 2021
    • 1 August 2021
    ...in circumstances where they are not responsible for placing themselves in the position of actual conflict: see Edge v Pensions Ombudsman [1998] Ch 512, 538-41 (Sir Richard Scott V-C). Our analysis here is, however, focused on cases where the fiduciary is the author of their own (120) Holyoa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT