Editorial Note
| Published date | 01 December 1942 |
| Author | R. S. T. Chorley |
| Date | 01 December 1942 |
| DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1942.tb02861.x |
THE
MODERN
LAW
REVIEW
VOl.
VI
DECEMBER,
1942
Nos.
I
and
2
EDITORIAL
NOTE
HE rationing of paper makes it impossible to publish
Volume
VI
in four parts of
80
pages each. The present
double issue of
96
pages will be followed by two issues of
80
pages each. In order to make full use
of
the available paper
all the contents of the review will be printed in small type and
articles and the various sections will not begin
on
a new page.
The first article in this issue is, however, printed in large type as
it had been set
up
before the necessity for these economies arose.
May we also request those readers who have subscribed by
means of
a
Banker’s Order to instruct their bankers to increase the
annual payments to
16s.
and to have these payments made tc
our bankers, the Midland Bank Limited, Belsize Park Branch,
147
Haverstock Hill, London,
N.W.3?
T
R.
S.
T.
CHORLEY.
for
the
Editorial
Committee.
THE HARRIS TWEED CASE
AND
FREEDOM OF TRADE
T
is not often that an English decision openly reveals the
political and social ideals which support the law. American
law, in this respect,
is
very different. The Constitution,
as
the
supreme source of law, enforceable by the Courts, necessitates a
legal interpretation of the political, economic and social principles,
such as freedom of person or property, which it formulates in
I
To continue reading
Request your trial