Eeles v Lambert

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1681
Date01 January 1681
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 511

UPPER BENCH COURT AT WESTMINSTER

Barker and Martyn

barker and martyn. Trin. 23 Car. Bane. Reg. Arrest of judgment in trespass. The case between Barker and Martyn was again moved, which was briefly this, an action of trespass was brought by Barker against Martin, wherein he declares, that the defendant had broken his house, and had taken away quinque inatrumenta ferrea, Anglice fetters. In arrest of judgement exception vras taken to the declaration, that instrumenta ferrea, Anglice fetters, was not a good expression in Latin (as it ought to be) of fetters, because there was a proper Latin word for fetters, namely compes, so that it ought to have been quinque compedes, or quinque paria compedum, and not as it is, for the word instrumentum is uncertain, and may be used to signifie any thing else with an Anglice added to it as well as fetters, and as it is the pleading is not all in Latin as the statute directs to avoid barbarism, and the word Anglice when it is properly used in a declaration is to help words of art, which cannot be expressed without an Anglice, and is not to be used where there is a proper Latin word to signifie the thing, as in this case there is. On the other side it was said, that general words might be good in a declaration, and barbarous words sometimes, and cited Hobarts Reports, 267. and Ward and Smiths case, Trin. 4 lac. Rot. 2305. Roll lustice, It is a hard thing to maintain this declaration, for if it should be admitted good it would bring in all barbarism in pleadings, and any senseless word might be used with an Anglice joyned with it, and he said one was endicted for using quandam artem Anglice of a draper, and it was adjudged naught, and in the case between Tailour and Taylour 9 Car. trespass was brought pro decem caporiibus, Anglice capons, & avibus dotnesticis, Anglice powltry, and adjudged not good. Yet the rule of the Court was to argue it again Saturday next following.

English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 512

UPPER BENCH COURT AT WESTMINSTER

Eeles and Lambert

512 TRIN. 23 CAR. STYLE, 88. eeles and lambert. Trin. 23 Car. Bane. Reg. Pasc. 22 Car. Rot. 1646. An action of covenant against an executor. Eeles brought an action of covenant against Lambert the executor of Sir Molton Lambert, and declares that Sir Molton Lambert did in his [38] life time by his indenture let certain lands utito him for years, and covenanted thereby for himself, his executors, administrators, and assigns, that the lessee should not be put out of possession of the lands let by him during the said term, and that since the death of Sir Molton Lambert his lessor, he was put out of possession by such an one, and upon this he brings his action of covenant against the executor. The defendant pleads, no assets, upon this an issue was joyned, and a special verdict was found, to this effect, that Sir Molton Lambert did let the lands mentioned in the declaration to Eeles prout, & that there was such a covenant in the deed prout, and that the plaintiff was put out of possession of the lands prout. They find likewise, that Sir Molton Lambert made his will, and made the defendant his executor, and died; that Sir Molton Lambert by his will gave many legacies of goods, and that the defendant before the plaintiff was put out of possession, did pay all the legacies in kind, and that besides those legacies he had not assets to discharge the covenant. Upon this verdict the matter in law was this, whether the executor ought to have forborn the payment of the legacies, and to have expected till the end of the term let to the plaintiff, or till the covenant had been broken, and for doing otherwise should not be charged with the covenant de bonis propriis ; or whether the covenant not being broken in the life of the testator, nor before the legacies paid, he had not paid the legacies as he ought, and should not be freed from being charged with the covenant de bonis propriis. Upon opening of the case Roll Justice said, that a decree in Chancery against an executor, shall not he satisfied before an obligation made by the testator, and become due after his death. Saturday following was set to here councell again.

English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 525

UPPER BENCH COURT AT WESTMINSTER

Eeles and Lambert

eeles and lambert. Mich. 23 Car. Bane. Eeg. Vid. antea. Argument upon a spetiall verdict. The case between Eeles and Lambert was again moved, which upon a speciall verdict found was this; Sir Molton Lambert makes a lease of certain lands to Eeles for 21 years by deed, and covenants for himself, his executors, administrators, and assigns, that the lessee shall peaceably, and quietly enjoy the lands let, during all the term, the lessor makes his will, and thereby makes Lambert the defendant his executor, and dyes, and by the will divers goods in specie are devised to sundry persons, Lambert the executor...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Merck Frosst Canada Ltd. v. Canada (Minister of Health), [2012] N.R. TBEd. FE.001
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 12 de novembro de 2010
    ...juges majoritaires ont fait référence, au par. 60, à une disposition précisant que l'étranger est interdit de territoire en application de l'al. 38(1) c ) de la Loi sur l'immigration et la protection des réfugiés , L.C. 2001, ch. 27, si son état de santé "entraînerait ou risquerait d'e......
  • Beloit Canada Ltée. c. Valmet-Dominion Inc. (C.A.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 23 de abril de 1997
    ...à la cause d’action, et non pas à la réparation par «dommages et intérêts». 61 62 Relying on Mastini v. Bell Telephone Co. of Canada et al.,38 he held that an infringement of a patent is a tort or delict under thé law of Québec and is thé type of harm or “dommages” targeted by Article 2261.......
  • Taxiprop Pty Ltd v Neutron Holdings Inc
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 29 de outubro de 2020
    ...5 August 2015 August 2013 model Lime Kia Carnival listed as part of Lime fleet with notation “Fleet change S/S to LIME 06/06/2014” Annexure AL-38 1st line CB1523 21 August 2015 to 15 June 2017 Continuously providing transport services, (except for brief suspensions for missing inspections o......
  • Verret v. N.B.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • 22 de dezembro de 2011
    ...et techniques reconnues et d'usage courant. La demande était limitée à une indemnité en vertu de l'al. 38(1) a) de la Loi . Aucune indemnité n'était réclamée pour trouble de jouissance, préjudice, ou perte d'avantage écon......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Food Policy Action Releases Scorecard for 114th Congress’ First Year
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 18 de novembro de 2015
    ...except Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT). Here are the scores for some members of Congress Food Safety News regularly follows: Robert Aderholt (R-AL): 38 (up from 0) Roy Blunt (R-MO): 40 (up from 17) Thad Cochran (R-MS): 57 (up from 50) Susan Collins (R-ME): 88 (up from 75) Rosa DeLauro (D-CT): 10......
25 books & journal articles
  • La función pública de la Unión Europea: las influencias de los sistemas de función pública nacional e internacional
    • European Union
    • Función pública de la Unión Europea: (Auto) regulación institucional. Las DGA de las instituciones europeas
    • 1 de novembro de 2014
    ...reglas que otorgan cierta transparencia a algunas cuestiones. Muy particularmente otorga una remuneración fija para sus miembros que es igual al 38,5% del sueldo base de un juez del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea. Este porcentaje equivale aproximadamente a unos 7.900 € brutos al m......
  • Addressing the Problem: The Executive Branches
    • United States
    • Environmental justice: legal theory and practice. 3rd Edition
    • 20 de novembro de 2014
    ...12898. EPA’s approach does not need to change in light of the 2013 Supreme Court 7-1 decision in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin et al ., 38 where the Court sent the case on race-based college admissions back to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals for another look. Texas uses race as o......
  • Addressing the Problem: The Executive Branches
    • United States
    • Environmental justice: legal theory and practice. 4th edition
    • 20 de fevereiro de 2018
    ...12898. EPA’s approach does not need to change in light of the 2013 Supreme Court 7-1 decision in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin et al ., 38 where the Court sent the case on race-based college admissions back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for another look. Texas......
  • Los intentos por lograr la incorporación de Quebec en el consenso constitucional: los acuerdos del Lago Meech y Charlottetown
    • Canada
    • La vertebración de Quebec en el modelo federal canadiense (2ª parte)
    • 1 de janeiro de 2019
    ...en la tercera semana de septiembre, también realizada por Angus Reid, arrojaba un triunfo del rechazo del Acuerdo en Quebec, por 45% frente al 38%, así como en Columbia Británica y Alberta, por 50% frente al 34%. Y los resultados en Manitoba y Saskatchewan eran de un estrecho triunfo del “S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 provisions

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT