Egmont (Earl of) v Smith. Smith v Egmont (Earl of)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1876 |
| Date | 1876 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
Pittack v Naviede
...Mr Dutton's research discovered recent judicial authority on the matter. What he does point to is a dictum of Sir George Jessel MR in Earl of Egmont v Smith (1871) 6 Ch D 469. That case primarily concerned the purchaser's ability to insist on the property being conveyed to him in separate l......
-
DAVID O'KEEFFE v PATRICK WALSH, JOHN CONDON, and Others
...569. Daly v. MurrayUNK 17 L. R. Ir. 185. Dawson v. M'ClellandIR [1899] 2 I. R. 486. Dease's CaseUNK 15 L. R. Ir. 356. Egmont v. SmithELR 6 Ch. D. 469. Ex parte BunburyELR [1901] 2 K. B. 458. Frankenburg v. Great Horseless Carriage CompanyELR [1900] 1 Q. B. 504. Fulham v. M'Carthy 1 H. L. Ca......
-
Englewood Properties Ltd v Patel and Another
...that the vendor is a constructive trustee for the purchaser of the estate from the moment the contract is entered into." (b) In Egmont v Smith (1877) 6 Ch D 469 Sir George Jessel MR said (at 475–6): "He is certainly a trustee for the purchaser, a trustee, no doubt, with peculiar duties and ......
-
Underwood v HM Revenue and Customs
...in equity a trustee for the purchaser ( Lysaght v Edwards (1876) 2 Ch D 499) but a trustee with peculiar duties and liabilities: Earl of Egmont v Smith (1877) 6 Ch D 469, 475. In Englewood Properties Ltd v Patel [2005] EWHC 188 (Ch), [2005] 1 WLR 1961, at [40] et seq I reviewed the authori......
Request a trial to view additional results