Egmont (Earl of) v Smith. Smith v Egmont (Earl of)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Date1876
Year1876

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • Pittack v Naviede
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 24 June 2010
    ...recent judicial authority on the matter. What he does point to is a dictum of Sir George Jessel MR in Earl of Egmont v Smith (1871) 6 Ch D 469. That case primarily concerned the purchaser's ability to insist on the property being conveyed to him in separate lots, but the relevant clause als......
  • Abdulla v Shah
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Dictum of Sir George Jessel M.R. in Egmont (Earl of) v. Smith (1877) 6 Ch.D. 469 at 476 ... ...
  • DAVID O'KEEFFE v PATRICK WALSH, JOHN CONDON, and Others
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 5 June 1903
  • Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd v Scott (Mortgage Business Plc intervening)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 22 October 2014
    ... ... … with peculiar duties and liabilities": Earl of Egmont v Smith (1877) 6 Ch D 469, 475 , per ... ...
  • Get Started for Free