Ehmler and Another v Hall

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1993
Year1993
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Conarken Group Ltd and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 21 Julio 2010
    ...it must be closely associated with the physical damage and the work done to repair or replace the damaged property. 48 The case of Ehmler and another v Hall [1993] 1 EGLR 137 involved a negligent defendant crashing his car into a car showroom owned by the plaintiffs, which had been let. The......
  • HSBC Rail (UK) Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd (Formerly Railtrack Plc)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 Noviembre 2005
    ...the goods) the bailor will have suffered a real loss and will be compensated accordingly. So also if a lessor has to forgo rent as in Ehmler v Hall [1993] 1 EGLR 137. There is, however, just no need for a bailor or lessor to be compensated if the goods have been repaired or replaced and he ......
  • Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Conarken Group Ltd and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 Mayo 2011
    ...But she cannot claim [against the tortfeasor] the whole cost as the cost of mitigating the loss of the use of her car." 41 In Ehmler & Another v Hall [1993] 2 EG 115, Nolan LJ, with whom Parker LJ and Kennedy LJ agreed, affirmed the principle stated by Lord Reid in Hughes v Lord Advocate [1......
  • Ms Lorna Armstead v Royal Sun Alliance Insurance Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 Abril 2022
    ...by the Courts in Network Rail Infrastructure v Conarken. Mr Williams submitted that a similar approach had been taken in Ehmler v Hall [1993] 1 EGLR 137. 29 Mr Williams submitted that an application of the six questions identified by the Supreme Court in Manchester Building Society v Grant ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Redefining Legal Responsibility for Pure Economic Loss in the Innovation Economy
    • New Zealand
    • Canterbury Law Review No. 26-2020, January 2020
    • 1 Enero 2020
    ...size and the width of the range of possible claims has acted as a deterrent to extension of economic protection.” 96 See Ehmler v Hall [1993] 1 EGLR 137. 97 he “Naxos” (1972) 1 Lloyds L Rep 149; Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd , above n ; and see also, SCM (United Kingdom) Ltd , above n 54. 98 S......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT