Elder Dempster Lines Ltd v Ishag (Lycaon)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1983 |
| Year | 1983 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
- P T Karya Sumiden Indonesia v Oceanmasters Marine Services Sdn Bhd
-
Daniel Carlos Scenna v Persons Unknown Using the Identity “Nancy Chen”
...the proposition that the “compelled by law” exception does not apply to foreign law and/or foreign court orders: see XY & Z v B [1983] 2 Lloyds Rep 548 (an English case); and FDC Co Ltd v The Chase Manhattan Bank NA [1990] 1 HKLR 277 (Hong Kong). Although there is as yet no Australian auth......
-
UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd
...East West Corporation v DKBS 1912 [2003] QB 1509; [2003] 1 Lloyd's Rep 239 (folld) Elder Dempster Lines v Zaki Ishag (The Lycaon) [1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 548 (refd) Bills of Lading Act (Cap 384, 1994 Rev Ed) s 5 (2) (consd);ss 1 (2), 2 (1), 2 (1) (a), 2 (4), 5 (1), 5 (2) (a), 5 (2) (b), 5 (3) ......
-
Infinity Treasures Pte Ltd v Global Currency Exchange Network Ltd
...unnecessarily caused any portion of the costs, he will not be entitled to recover and may be called upon to pay costs”. In Elder Dempster Lines v Ishag (The Lycaon) [1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 548, 554, Mr Justice Lloyd held that: “Normally … the applicant for inter pleader relief will be allowed......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
RIGHTS UNDER BILLS OF LADING: TRAWLING THROUGH SINGAPORE WATERS
...v Maclean & Co, ibid, as is an ordinary received-for-shipment bill of lading: see Elder Dempster Lines v Zaki Ishag (The Lycaon)[1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 548 and The Ship “Marlborough Hill” v Alex Cowan and Sons Limited[1921] 1 AC 444. 3 It is worthy of note that in Homburg Houtimport BV v Agros......
-
HOLDER OF A BILL OF LADING
...Glyn Mills & Co v East & West India Dock Co, supra, note 4; The Sagona, supra, note 4. 11 Scrutton, supra, note 1, p. 184; The Lycaon[1983] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 548; Ishaq v Allied Bank[1981] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 92; Mitchel v Ede(1840) 11 A & E 888; 113 ER 651. 12 The Future Express [1992] 2 Lloyd’s Rep......