Eldridge v Burgess
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1877 |
Date | 1877 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Rodriquez v Ebanks
...(5) Cooke v. GillELR(1873), L.R. 8 C.P. 107, referred to. (6) Dewitt v. Dewitt, 2011 (1) CILR 298, applied. (7) Eldridge v. BurgessELR(1878), 7 Ch. D. 411, applied. (8) Letang v. Cooper, [1965] 1 Q.B. 232; [1964] 3 W.L.R. 573; [1964] 2 All E.R. 929; [1964] 2 Lloyd”s Rep. 339, followed. (9) ......
-
Fielding v Rigby (trading as Ashlea Hotel)
...where one sees the following: 9 "But where a sole plaintiff or a sole defendant dies, etc., the action becomes abated or defective ( Eldridge v. Burgess; Jackson v. N.E.Ry. (1877) 5 Ch.D. 844) until steps are taken to continue proceedings under this rule. And so in the case of the assignmen......
-
Sidey Alfaro Rodriquez v Evort Earl Ebanks
...or defect when the cause of action survives or continues in some person who is before the court: per Fry J in Eldridge v Burgess (1878) 7 Ch. D 411; Re Shepherd (1890) 43 Ch. D. 131 at 136 65 So where, for instance, a co-plaintiff who has a separate cause of action or a co-defendant several......
-
Sidey Alfaro Rodriquez Petitioner v Evort Earl Ebanks Respondent v Rhonda Lue Ebanks Intervener
...or defect when the cause of action survives or continues in some person who is before the court: per Fry J in Eldridge v Burgess (1878) 7 Ch. D 411; Re Shepherd (1890) 43 Ch. D. 131 at 136 65 So where, for instance, a co-plaintiff who has a separate cause of action or a co-defendant several......
Request a trial to view additional results