Electric & Musical Industries v Lissen Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1938 |
| Date | 1938 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
76 cases
- Clorox Australia Pty Ltd v International Consolidated Business Pty Ltd
- Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie Sa v Uim Chemical Services Pty Ltd
- Atlantis Corporation Pty Ltd v Schindler
-
Bean Innovations Pte Ltd and Another v Flexon (Pte) Ltd
...principal determinant of the scope of the monopoly for which protection is provided. In Electric and Musical Industries Ltd v Lissen Ltd (1939) 56 RPC 23 at 39, Lord Russell of Killowen The function of the claims is to define clearly and with precision the monopoly claimed, so that others m......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Inventive Step In Malaysia
...to their earlier decision in SKB Shutters , which in turn referred to Electric and Musical Industries Ltd&Ors v Lissen Ltd&Anor (1939) 56 RPC 23 where it was stated 'one looks at the language of the claims which define the scope and monopoly claimed' and restated 'that in the determ......
1 books & journal articles
-
INTERPRETING PATENT CLAIMS: SOME THOUGHTS ON THE UK KIRIN-AMGEN DECISION
...or stability”: see National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth[1965] AC 1175 at 1248. 2 Electric & Musical Industries Ld v Lissen Ld [1939] 56 RPC 23 (“EMI”) at 39 (per Lord Russell of Killowen). 3 Ibid. A claim, and it alone, defines the monopoly; and the patentee is under a statutory obligat......