Elizabeth Warburton, - Plaintiff in Error; Loveland, ex dem. G. and H. Ivie, - Defendant in Error
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Exchequer |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1831 |
| Date | 01 January 1831 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
14 cases
-
Bannerji HL v Chin Cheng Realty (Pte) Ltd
...Moh Seng Realty (Pte) Ltd v Bannerji H L [1985-1986] SLR (R) 296; [1984-1985] SLR 79 (folld) Warburton v Loveland (1832) 2 Dow & Cl 480; 6 ER 806 (folld) Rules of the Supreme Court (Amendment) 1982 (GN No S 304/1982)rr 1, 11 Rules of the Supreme Court 1970, TheO 59r 31 (1) Appendix 1 (consd......
-
Att Gen v Donalds
...dicta of Lord Parker, C.J. applied. (7) R. v. Whittaker, 1986-87 CILR 189, explained. (8) Warburton v. LovelandENR(1832), 2 Dow & Cl. 480; 6 E.R. 806, dicta of Tindal, C.J. applied. Legislation construed: Criminal Procedure Code (1995 Revision) (Law 13 of 1975, revised 1995), s.5(1): The re......
-
Kammins Ballrooms Company Ltd v Zenith Investments (Torquay) Ltd
...and explicit, the court must give effect to it "for in that case the words of the statute speak the intention of the Legislature" ( Warburton v. Loveland (1832) 2 Dow & C1. 480 per Tindal C.J. at p. 489). "and in so doing it must bear in mind that its function is jus dicere not jus dare: th......
-
Re Rights of Person Arrested or Detained; Constitutional Reference No 1 of 1977 under s19 of the Constitution [1977] PNGLR 362
...1 TLR 91 at 92, Gahan (Inspector of Taxes) v Chloride Batteries Ltd [1955] 1 WLR 277 at 283, Warburton v Loveland, Ivie and Others (1831–32) 6 ER 806 at 809, Hare v Gocher [1962] 2 QB 641 at 646, and Richardson v Austin (1911) 12 CLR 463 at 470 referred to. As there are no other Constitutio......
Get Started for Free