Elizabeth Warburton, - Plaintiff in Error; Loveland, ex dem. G. and H. Ivie, - Defendant in Error
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1831 |
| Date | 01 January 1831 |
| Court | Exchequer |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Bannerji HL v Chin Cheng Realty (Pte) Ltd
...Moh Seng Realty (Pte) Ltd v Bannerji H L [1985-1986] SLR (R) 296; [1984-1985] SLR 79 (folld) Warburton v Loveland (1832) 2 Dow & Cl 480; 6 ER 806 (folld) Rules of the Supreme Court (Amendment) 1982 (GN No S 304/1982)rr 1, 11 Rules of the Supreme Court 1970, TheO 59r 31 (1) Appendix 1 (consd......
-
Att Gen v Donalds
...dicta of Lord Parker, C.J. applied. (7) R. v. Whittaker, 1986-87 CILR 189, explained. (8) Warburton v. LovelandENR(1832), 2 Dow & Cl. 480; 6 E.R. 806, dicta of Tindal, C.J. applied. Legislation construed: Criminal Procedure Code (1995 Revision) (Law 13 of 1975, revised 1995), s.5(1): The re......
-
Cleary v Fitzgerald
...Lester v. Lester 6 Ir. Ch. R. 513. Mancnamara v. Carey I. R. 1 Eq. 9. Fenwick v. GreenwellENR 10 Beav. 412. Warburton v. LovelandENR 2 Dow & Cl. 480, 495. Gardiner v. Blesinton 1 Ir. Ch. R. 79, 88. Dillon v. Costello Cited 1 Jones, 410; Molesworth, 10. Gardiner v. Blesinton 1 Ir. Ch. R. 64.......
-
Kammins Ballrooms Company Ltd v Zenith Investments (Torquay) Ltd
...and explicit, the court must give effect to it "for in that case the words of the statute speak the intention of the Legislature" ( Warburton v. Loveland (1832) 2 Dow & C1. 480 per Tindal C.J. at p. 489). "and in so doing it must bear in mind that its function is jus dicere not jus dare: th......
Request a trial to view additional results