Elliott v Boynton

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1924
Year1924
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Canas Property Company Ltd v K. L. Television Services Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • April 13, 1970
    ...525). Sitting at first instance, I myself said, giving judgment straight off the reel (at page 532), having in mind ( Elliott v. Boynton 1924 1 K.B. 236): "If a lessor elects to determine a lease for forfeiture, it is sufficient for him to issue a writ for possession. The forfeiture dates ......
  • David Jones Ltd v Leventhal
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Coombs v Serrette
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • High Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • June 20, 1979
    ...which are in the nature of damages for trespass.” 61 See also Clifton Securities Ltd. v. Huntley and others [1948] 2 All E.R. p. 283. Elliot v. Boynton [1924] 1 Ch. p.236. Using the above figures and striking a mean I consider that mesne profits of $2,500 per month is reasonable. I therefor......
  • Boustany v Pigott
    • Antigua and Barbuda
    • Court of Appeal (Antigua and Barbuda)
    • June 17, 1991
    ...whether to grant means profits to a landlord who had determined the lease with a tenant, it was clearly stated by Warrington L.J. in Elliott v. Boynton (1924) 1 Ch. 236 at page 250: “Now damages by way of means profits are awarded in cases where the defendant has wrongfully withheld possess......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT