Elmford Ltd v City of Glasgow Council (No 2)

JurisdictionScotland
Judgment Date12 September 2000
Date12 September 2000
Docket NumberNo 14
CourtCourt of Session (Outer House)

OUTER HOUSE

Lord Clarke

No 14
ELMFORD LTD
and
CITY OF GLASGOW COUNCIL (No 2)

Administrative lawJudicial reviewWhether remedy available only in respect of decision

Roads and streetsPublic passageWhether land dedicated to public passageWhether frontager had right of accessRoads (Scotland) Act 1970 (cap 20), sec 29(1)Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 (cap 54), sec 1(1)1

Section 29 of the Roads (Scotland) Act 1970 provided that a highway authority may acquire by agreement or compulsorily, land required in connection with the construction of a highway.2 Section 1(1) of the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 obliges a local roads authority to manage and maintain all such roads in their area as are for the time being entered in a list maintained by them, and gives them power for the purposes of such management and maintenance to reconstruct, alter, widen, improve or renew any such road or determine the means by which the public right of passage over it, or any part of it, may be exercised.

The petitioners lodged a petition for judicial review seeking declarator (1) that they were entitled to take vehicular and pedestrian access and egress across a certain strip of land between the metalled surface of a link road owned by the respondents as roads authority and land belonging to the petitioners; and (2) that the respondents' actings in purporting to charge or obtain value from, or otherwise prevent, the petitioners in respect of taking such access and egress were ultra vires. The petitioners wished access over the strip for a proposed development of a road services station on their land. The petitioners considered they were entitled to such access as of right whereas the respondents' position was that the strip being in their sole ownership, access and egress over it was something which they had the right to prevent, control or grant for a consideration. The land comprising the metalled road surface and the strip had been acquired compulsorily by the respondents' statutory predecessors, who had constructed the road surface and made an entry in the list of roads under sec 1 of the 1984 Act. The petitioners argued that the land had been acquired for road purposes, and, not having been appropriated by the respondents for any other purpose, must be deemed to be part of the land constituting the road, and accordingly the petitioner as the owner of land fronting on a highway, had a right of access over the strip. The respondents argued that the strip was not part of the road.

H...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Michael Hamilton And Another V. Robert Kennedy Nairn
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 9 December 2009
    ...... to the pursuers, is the largest cattery north of Edinburgh and Glasgow. Under threat of a compulsory purchase order in respect of all or part of ...They have also obtained consent from Aberdeen City Council, the roads authority for the area, under s.56 of the Roads ...Home 1828 7S 39 and Elmford Limited v. Glasgow City Council 2001 SLT 725 paras.[11] and [19]. Once it ......
  • Transco Plc V. Glasgow City Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 21 June 2005
    ...review invoking section 45(b) of the Court of Session Act 1988 (see, for example, Elmford Limited v City of Glasgow Council (No. 2) 2001 S.C. 267). [15]In relation to the defenders' first submission, it is clear that the pursuers could have applied for judicial review seeking specific imple......
  • McCalls Ltd v Aberdeen City Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session (Inner House)
    • 10 July 2020
    ...1970 SC 200; 1971 SLT 13; 1970 SLT (Notes) 69 Drika BVBA v Giles [2018] CSIH 42; 2018 SLT 823 Elmford Ltd v City of Glasgow Council (No 2) 2001 SC 267; 2001 SLT 725 Gray v St Andrews and Cupar District Committees of Fifeshire County Council 1911 SC 266; 1910 2 SLT 354 Logan v Wang (UK) Ltd ......
  • Michael And Sarah Hamilton V. Robert Kennedy Nairn
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 7 September 2010
    ...(1828) 6 S 544; Moncreiffe v Lord Provost of Perth (1842) 5D 298; McRobert v Reid 1914 SC 633; Elmford Ltd v Glasgow City Council (No 2) 2001 SC 267). It was not disputed that the listing of Culter House Road was intended to identify the area between the two drystane dykes on either side of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT