Emanuel v Emanuel
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1945 |
| Year | 1945 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
- Noble v Noble and Ellis (No. 2)
- Brooks v Burns Philp Trustee Company Ltd
-
Zainal bin Kuning and Others v Chan Sin Mian Michael and Another
...4 Ch D 24 (folld) Charu Chandra, ReAIR 1917 Cal 253 (folld) Eliza F T Higgs Vatcher v Henry Paull [1915] AC 372 (refd) Emanuel v Emanuel [1946] P 115 (refd) Glinski v McIver [1962] AC 726 (distd) Henderson v Preston (1888) 21 QB 362 (refd) Herniman v Smith [1938] AC 305 (refd) Hicks v Faulk......
- Douglas v Douglas
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
LEGAL BURDEN OF PROOF AND EVIDENTIAL BURDEN OF PROOF, DISTINCTION BETWEEN
...burden and the evidential burden. The legal burden is the proof which remains constant throughout a trial. See: Emanuel v. Emanuel (1945) 2 All E.R. 494 at page 496. It is the burden of establishing the facts and contentions which will support a partys case. If at the end of trial, he has ......
-
The Two Faces of Compromise
...1964), p. 43; A. J. P. Taylor, The Course of Ger-man History: A Survey of the Development of Germany since 1815 (New York:Coward-McCann, 1946), p. 115. 328 ing to compromise. For virtually all British politicians it is a self-evident truth &dquo;the willingness to compromise is as desirable......