Embassy of Brazil v de Castro Cerqueira
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 2014 |
| Date | 2014 |
| Year | 2014 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Akhmedova v Akhmedov
...v Flash Entertainment FZ LLC [2016] EWHC 1951 (QB) (28 July 2016, unreported). Embassy of Brazil v de Castro Cerqueira [2014] 1 WLR 3718, [2014] ICR 703. Erste Group Bank AG, London Branch v JSC ‘VMZ Red October’ [2015] EWCA Civ 379, [2015] 1 CLC 706. Excalibur Ventures LLC v Texas Keystone......
-
Nigerian High Commission v Miss M E Iheme
...F wrong Respondent had been named, and that the claim could not proceed. 47. I note also that in Embassy of Brazil v de Castro Cerqueira [2014] ICR 703, the Employment Appeal Tribunal accepted that a claim against the embassy was in reality a G claim against a foreign state. 48. In that cas......
-
Bush v Baines, Taylor and Attorney General
...[2014] EWHC 112 (Comm); [2014] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 733, referred to. (9) Embassy of Brazil v. de Castro Cerqueira, [2014] 1 W.L.R. 3718; [2014] I.C.R. 703, applied. (10) Gabato v. Immigration Appeals Tribunal, 2011 (1) CILR N [6], applied.applied. (11) Habib Bank Ltd. v. Central Bank of Sudan......
-
Josias Van Zyl and others v Kingdom of Lesotho
...is “general and unqualified” and “not limited to proceedings seeking judgment” (PCL at [30]). In Embassy of Brazil v de Castro Cerqueira [2014] ICR 703, Lewis J stated at [23] that “the purpose of [s 12 of the UK Act] is to provide for a means by which a state can be given notice of proceed......