EMI Records Ltd v Kudhail

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1985
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 12 May 2021
    ...They could be sued both personally and as representing unidentified associates, e.g. copyright piracy claims: EMI Records Ltd v Kudhail [1985] FSR 36. (11) A wider jurisdiction permitting claims against persons unknown was first recognised in Bloomsbury Publishing Group plc v News Group New......
  • Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and Another v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 23 May 2003
    ...persons who cannot be identified by name. Amongst other cases, he has drawn my attention to two quite recent decisions. The first is EMI Records v Kudhail [1985] FSR 36 in which the plaintiff, EMI Records, sought injunctive relief on an ex parte application against a Mr Kudhail and other un......
  • Stacey Brothers Plumbing Pty Ltd v Waterco Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and Another v News Group Newspapers Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 May 2003
    ...can only be taken against defendants who can be identified by name. Mr Kitchin QC has referred to EMI Records Limited v Kudhail & others [1985] FSR 36 and Tony Blain Pty Limited v Splain & other persons unknown [1994] FSR 497, to both of which Laddie J also referred. Laddie J was sensitive ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Service Of Court Proceedings On Unknown Defendants In The Time Of Crypto
    • Cayman Islands
    • Mondaq Cayman Islands
    • 1 December 2022
    ...Footnotes 1. Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd [2019] UKSC 6; [2019] 1 W.L.R. 1471 2. See EMI Records Ltd v Kudhail [1985] FSR 36 3. Ernst & Young Ltd and Others v Department of Immigration [2015 (1) CILR 151] 4. ChainSwap was not itself the owner of the stolen tokens. However, ......
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT