Enmore Estates Ltd v Darsan

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1970
Date1970
Year1970
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Kijal Resort Sdn Bhd v Pentadbir Tanah Kemaman
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Tunku Yaacob Holdings Sdn Bhd v Pentadbir Tanah Kedah
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • JD Ltd v Comptroller of Income Tax
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 2 December 2005
    ...Company, Limited v Vandry [1920] AC 662 at 676 (per Lord Sumner). This was followed by the Privy Council in Enmore Estates Ltd v Darsan [1970] AC 497 at 506 and by the Malaysian Supreme Court in Foo Loke Ying v Television Broadcasts Ltd [1985] 2 MLJ 35. In the latter case, it was held at 43......
  • ENVAC SCANDINAVIA A.B. vs MUHIBBAH ENGINEERING (M) BHD
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 12 November 2020
    ...that if a word or phrase appears in a statute it was put there for a purpose. See also Privy Council decision in Enmore Estates v. Darsan [1970] AC 497 at p. The relevant part of the Supreme Court’s judgment in Foo Loke Yong is as follows: “Section 5(2) prescribes the periods for the subsis......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Montesquieu and pepper (inspector of taxes) v. Hart
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 6-1, June 1996
    • 1 June 1996
    ...accepted that the legislature too may be presumed not to have intended to act contrary to them." 35 31 Enmore Estates v. Ramkhellawar (1970) 15 W.I.R. 192. 32 Re Fredrick (1970) 16 W.I.R. 439. 33 (1975) 23 W.I.R. 463. 34 Juveniles Law, Cap 198, sec.29(1). 35 Ibid., at p.467. But see also Sa......
  • Get Started for Free