Enmore Estates Ltd v Darsan
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1970 |
Date | 1970 |
Year | 1970 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
11 cases
- Kijal Resort Sdn Bhd v Pentadbir Tanah Kemaman
- Tunku Yaacob Holdings Sdn Bhd v Pentadbir Tanah Kedah
-
JD Ltd v Comptroller of Income Tax
...Company, Limited v Vandry [1920] AC 662 at 676 (per Lord Sumner). This was followed by the Privy Council in Enmore Estates Ltd v Darsan [1970] AC 497 at 506 and by the Malaysian Supreme Court in Foo Loke Ying v Television Broadcasts Ltd [1985] 2 MLJ 35. In the latter case, it was held at 43......
-
ENVAC SCANDINAVIA A.B. vs MUHIBBAH ENGINEERING (M) BHD
...that if a word or phrase appears in a statute it was put there for a purpose. See also Privy Council decision in Enmore Estates v. Darsan [1970] AC 497 at p. The relevant part of the Supreme Court’s judgment in Foo Loke Yong is as follows: “Section 5(2) prescribes the periods for the subsis......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Montesquieu and pepper (inspector of taxes) v. Hart
...accepted that the legislature too may be presumed not to have intended to act contrary to them." 35 31 Enmore Estates v. Ramkhellawar (1970) 15 W.I.R. 192. 32 Re Fredrick (1970) 16 W.I.R. 439. 33 (1975) 23 W.I.R. 463. 34 Juveniles Law, Cap 198, sec.29(1). 35 Ibid., at p.467. But see also Sa......
Get Started for Free